- May 3, 2004
Galleblære said:Did I touch a nerve there? I mean, as a veteran player of EU2 why would you advocate for a TP in Sweden, well knowing the consequences and potential exploit it can bring? Hence, my guess was that you wanted a "stronger Sweden". But I see that I was of course completly wrong, and you just... made an error?
Its not an error, I know it would make sweden a (potential) stronger colonizer, I havent denied that, but as I explained earlier: IMHO the ahistorical exploit lies in swedens possible ability to colonize for example america, not in with how many colonist one would use doing it. We cant stop a Swedish player from colonizing america if he really wants to regardless of +1 colonist or not. But we can for certain give Lappland a historical starting population.
Its one thing if you dont agree with me on that, I totally respect that, but please spare us from comments of the kind: "Sven_vegas behaves nationalistic" they doesnt add anything(OT), if you have good real arguments, using them should be enough, and yes you did touch a nerve, the nerve of stupidiness. :rofl: