zdlugasz said:Frankly speaking Opole has better reasons to exist than Masovia. Masovia (in fact a hanfull of smaller duches) COMPLETELY stopped to have separate history after 1526 (and half of them already in XVth century becuase they were incorporated into Poland).
Opole on the other hand had interesting history at least till mid od XVIIth century.
(some of tidbits of Opole history were mentioned above).
So my controversial proposal: give Masovian tag to Opole o :looking around and fretting replies of pro-Masovian lobbysts:
But seriously, Opole had richer history than Masovia.
Umm..yea, did you actually read my post about not justifying new states based on them having better justification than an already existing state? If you can't get the evidence to get it to stand on its own merits, it won't be included.