-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I have plans to add cores to BB, but I don't think too many, maybe 3-5 more.Joohoo said:
What you think, please out with it.
EDIT: ALL THINKS THAT NEED TO BE DISCUSSED CAN BE FOUND IN POST NUMBER 3 ON PAGE 1
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5152896&postcount=3
Unless there has been some land swaping tool developed while I was gone from playing EU2 one would think that precious stability is more important to the playersJoohoo said:
maybe just reduce ak konyulus forts to minimum? on the other side all nation has mostly small forts in this scen...and persia has the shiite morale bonus...dont forget that!
in the bb case: cores on sachsen and 1 on a bohemian province...2-3 on other north germany provinces
in the bb case: cores on sachsen and 1 on a bohemian province...2-3 on other north germany provinces
I don't think soMatija said:Unless there has been some land swaping tool developed while I was gone from playing EU2 one would think that precious stability is more important to the players
I agree with Earen on this. Persia gets its expansion then and can go for iraq after that.
BB should have more cores, but it must not conflict early on with other nations fair chance to expand into germany as well. Giving it some extra cores in central germany would be good.
And Matija, people should war instead of province swaps
EDIT
O, and I suggest adjusting the vassal rule. Of course we must prevent MP bug manipulation but i dont think most of our current players are THAT technical about it (exception Petter and Earen prehaps ). We should not let people limit there conquering desires on this huge many prov map too much. I suggest limitting amount of vassals by 3 of which 2 must be annexed in 10 years (maybe 11-12). This way we promote war but limit peoples Badboy explosion. And limit people claiming "too much" with vassals but still let them use it.
BB should have more cores, but it must not conflict early on with other nations fair chance to expand into germany as well. Giving it some extra cores in central germany would be good.
And Matija, people should war instead of province swaps
EDIT
O, and I suggest adjusting the vassal rule. Of course we must prevent MP bug manipulation but i dont think most of our current players are THAT technical about it (exception Petter and Earen prehaps
). We should not let people limit there conquering desires on this huge many prov map too much. I suggest limitting amount of vassals by 3 of which 2 must be annexed in 10 years (maybe 11-12). This way we promote war but limit peoples Badboy explosion. And limit people claiming "too much" with vassals but still let them use it.
Seen said:And Matija, people should war instead of province swaps
Well I think you take a lot of diplomacy by doing so, but you are GMs and I'll stop bitching about it
Last edited:
Matija said:
They can do diplomacy in other way still. Countries rarely exchanged provinces in the history.
Players don't exchange province that often either, and yeah they can do diplomacy in other ways wich is happening right now behind the sceneNabukodonosor said:
Annexation of Austria please pm nowMatija said:Players don't exchange province that often either, and yeah they can do diplomacy in other ways wich is happening right now behind the scene
Joohoo said:I could start a AAR/Diplothread
You would make people write more AAR if you offered AAR rewards like they do in some games
, but since you don't like editing.