Originally posted by Johan Jung
Good work!!
The number of generals...so many![]()
Yes.. Thousands...!
And these are only for the 'majors'
I wonder what the complete total number is..
Originally posted by Johan Jung
Good work!!
The number of generals...so many![]()
Originally posted by sbrengard
Maybe the manpower pool increases or decrease over time.
You know, as people 'come of age' and 'get to old'.
Originally posted by Meiji-Tenno
Yes.. Thousands...!
And these are only for the 'majors'![]()
I wonder what the complete total number is..![]()
![]()
Originally posted by VultureGFF
POM POM... Let me see...
Just counted all leaders ingame up... If I counted correctly, there are now 4922 leaders in.
Originally posted by VultureGFF
POM POM... Let me see...
Just counted all leaders ingame up... If I counted correctly, there are now 4922 leaders in.
Originally posted by Pokka
Chinese manpower = 20?!!!
Even worse than Italy! Oh my god......
what setting is this?![]()
Originally posted by Meiji-Tenno
Hmm.. Maybe the Communists control the population!![]()
Maybe the Chinese manpower quickly increases, and the manpowers shown are only the starting ones. So maybe China is not as "mobilized for war". So the manpower is lower. Maybe.. Hmm.. Or maybe the Communists do control the peopleWhat is their manpower?
![]()
Meiji-Tenno
Originally posted by Pokka
Hehe maybe the Nationalist had the secret of DNA in 1930s. Therefore tons of clones soldiers were produced. But......this is not StarWars![]()
Originally posted by Meiji-Tenno
WOW!Thanks for counting!
Lots of leaders.. Maybe atleast 10,000 in all. I am expecting that the "non-majors" will have less leaders. So them all combined could probably atleast double it
Meiji-Tenno
Italy has bigger industry than China... at least thats what written in the FAQOriginally posted by Faeelin
God. Italy's really pathetic.
The only major with less industry is China. And that's truly sad.
Originally posted by VultureGFF
Nana... This is all leaders counted up... Minors as well. Minors have less leaders
But seriously, i'm still confused by that manpower issue....
Originally posted by Lint
To make it easy:
* You start with manpower x
Since birth rate > death rate you get more manpower as time goes on.
* Rate you get manpower is determinated by that 'small' manpower digit.