The video is all touchy-feely- and great and all, but the city has way too many skyscrapers still.
If you guys love realism as much as you say you do, please reduce the crazy amount of skyscrapers, that just looks fake.
I have said it before, and you guys say you like listening, but you should have to work hard to get skyscrapers, they shouldn't be all over the place like that- and there doesn't appear to be any transition between low and high density built into the game engine. That doesn't seem like a realistic city simulation to me, sorry.
there is a reason why developers made underpopulated skycrapers in this game. It is because it's easy to grow them. For a casual player.
now you might ask yourself, why will developers probably not listen to my personal demand of making the game harder and reducing the amount of skyscrapers?
If you listened to the video, you'd hear they talk about making game realistic as possible while
still being fun. That's a big red flag. It's a major indication that developers are after the casual market
And they're sort of right in doing so. If this game wants to break a 6-digit revenue, they have to call out the casuals. Simcity 2013 sold a million copies in the opening two weeks. I know it did so well sales-wise due to good reputation of the gaming genre, but still...
...It took comparably more realistic and comparably more complex "simcity 4" more than 5 years to sell the same ammount of copies.
One of the most common complaints about Simcity 4 by casual players was: "I can't build skyscrapers, wtf".
And the same complaint would proclaim a pretty bad reputation on a game, that literally has "skylines" in the title.
I say be happy with what you've got, no point in wasting time, convincing developers against the game design idea that was set 18 months ago already, and just wait for some mods that might balance the skyscrapers out a little bit more sensibly. This is what i will do anyway.