Here is it a new article from usgamer.net, this thim going more deep about thing like religion, knighthood and so on.
New article from usgamer expand on 12 questions
- Thread starter Vias
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
10. Muslim Rulers in Crusader Kings 3 won't have to worry about Decadence anymore
yes!
yes!
I’m very happy that the randomness of fabricating claims has been reduced, without becoming totally predictable ala EU4.
That is, I will not be allowed to call up the guards and levies separately from each other? Very bad, if so.
Last edited:
Article said:
Thank god they've finally added extended endgame — I don't know how often I'll use it, but it's nice to be able to properly finish up your plans before an EU export. (Not that they have plans for converters, but I'm sure someone will homebrew one eventually.)
I'm glad that they're not restricting themselves only to 867 and 1066, but I hope they'll at least include Iron Century and Alexiad (although apparently Alexiad isn't very popular). The loss of the specific date picker is a little disappointing but honestly I can't say I ever used it.
I am disappointed they are dumbing down lower level tiers and not even considering having playable barons. The comment that barons, mayors, etc are useless and annoying worries me. I have always loved being able to manipulate...I mean carefully micro-manage my barons and their families in addition to my own. I think PDS underestimates the number of players that love the challenge of growing a dynasty from the lowest rungs of society to the highest tiers of power.
Overall, I am liking less than half of what I have seen about CK3 so far...not a good ratio.
Overall, I am liking less than half of what I have seen about CK3 so far...not a good ratio.
Unless you're a Count (in which case they're still important in CK3), they are useless and annoying.
Fresh potential councilors are fresh potential councilors.
Brb, tossing a bishop into the oubliette and seeing if I can't get a better court chaplain.
Barons will continue in that role, at least — Henrik called baronies "refrigerators for potentially interesting characters".
Just use the character finder to locate a high learning courtier willing to join your court. Much more efficient, and easier on the tyranny.
I totally agree. Please allow the players to decide for themselves if they want to play as barons. If you worry about potential bugs, just make it so that you can only enable it using mods. That way everyone understands that it's an experimental, unsupported experience.
That sounds really good. Seems like you can have different contracts with different vassals, so one of them might not have to pay you any taxes at all, only being a vassal of yours in name.
Ofc, but free is free, so nice when you have them. And saves you on court space.
It's indeed a bit ahistorical to be able to revoke baronies without penalties, but in this case the convenience outweighs the former. Since it's just irritating, when you need a character to make a baby, but you must wait a million years for a fabricated claim or an excuse to imprison.
Game design isn't a democracy. The devs have to decide what to allocate their time and energy towards developing, and sometimes this means mechanics you'd like to see don't get developed, at least not right away.
That's a beautiful mental image
I didn't know how much I wanted to fridge a medieval character until now.
That's the point. I don't want them to develop anything, just not hardcode a game over screen if tier == baron, so modders can do something. Shouldn't be a problem, right?
Oh, well, yeah, that's fair. I thought you were saying you wanted them to code in an entire incomplete system for playable baronies that modders could enable and add to. My bad.