Naval AI is desperate to invade player or simply unintelligent AI decision making..

[BarrosRodrigues]

yes, i have a different view,no need to understand you. ai not building transports and ai building them, is clearly no improvement. try a byzantium start and look at otto navy, maybe you see a difference. if not, we dont understand each other

Lol AI not building transports and now building them but not knowing how to use them therefore making its overall strategic situation worse is an improvement? :rofl: Yeah we really don´t understand each other.

 

[Bragi]

Haha, in my Castile->Spain game, around 1480, I just fought a war against the French with my English allies for the second time. The first war (Engliand was the agressor) we won, very nice, get and released some stuff, England got Caux back.
In the second war, with England as the agressor, we had somewath of a stalemate. Why? Because England refused to land with its 61'000 men in France or in open doored Castile, and decided to let me fight this war on my own. Again. We could have won with ease, but I peaced out. Why? Because the perspective of fighting that war on my own again and being pulled to war the next centuries over and over again by an ally that is refusing to take part in that very war he started is .. dumb. So I drop the alliance. Very very sad, would this work properly, I wouldn't have any problems with "oh my god OP France", due to cleverly plan my diplomatic relations and stuff, but due to bugged AI it's still not possible.

 

[ahyangyi]

Lol AI not building transports and now building them but not knowing how to use them therefore making its overall strategic situation worse is an improvement? :rofl: Yeah we really don´t understand each other.

It's probably an improvement from a development POV. The lines of code you need to modify to make it finally works probably decreased.

 

[TheMeInTeam]

So, you wasted 100 Euro on a broken game, still buying everything on day 1, complain on the forums but still buy everything? Sounds like you are satisfied with their product. "broken" is a hard word and doesnt mean "not working flawless".

Non confirming goods can be called broken appropriately. His statement is perfectly reasonable and will stay that way until all advertised features work as advertised. There hasn't been a patch that was true so far to my knowledge lol.