-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
And why do they want to ruin Pakistan? Fine, Balochistan isn't especially useful. But the Pashtun-speaking territories are a good buffer zone for keeping the Mlech out of the densely-populated areas. Without Peshawar etc, there's nothing to stop the Taliban or whoever is in charge in Afghanistan from rolling down into Islamabad, Multan or even Lahore.
It's a neo-Crusader-pro-Israel-anti-Muslim-wank map. The people who draw these sort of maps imagine that (their) world will be a better place, if the big "scary" Muslim countries are all broken up and the "harmless" western-obedient countries like Jordan are enlarged. Colonialist post-9/11 thinking, basically. That's why Iran and Saudi-Arabia are broken up. Yemen isn't known for being a pro-western place, but it's currently only a placeholder country (i.e. dysfunctional country) so you can imagine enlargening as a pleasurable thing since it weakens Saudi-Arabia.
FWIW, Iran is a multicultural country and a Kurdish state would surely ease up the tensions in the Mid. East.
It would if there had always been a Kurdistan (always meaning from the end of WW1) but right now it would create new tensions before it solves anything.
It's debatable to what extent shaving of bits of desert would do that though.
Iran clearly has one predominant culture though (Farsi/Persian), although with significant minorities. It is no Belgium or Austria-Hungary.
I don't think it can get worse than 2 full-out uprisings and constant protests.
Wrong.
Kurdistan both Iraqi and Syrian is currently largely unaffected by the mess in those two countries. Few people are trying to kill the Kurds at the moment.
I can't see Iraq taking the loss of Kurdistan very well. Fortunately they are not in a position to do much about it but perhaps one day they will be.
They are unaffected precisely because of those uprisings that cut their links with the 2 countries.
You know that the Syrian Kurds have basically got de facto independence right now (Syrian Kurdistan), although of course their embryonic state is more frangible and endangered then Iraqi Kurdistan (the two are already allies though).
(For the Kurds that's 2 down, 2 to go...
)
(For the Kurds that's 2 down, 2 to go...
)
Last edited:
That doesn't alter the fact that neither Syria nor Iraq seem ready to recognise them as independent states. It's going to happen (in the case of Iraq) but it won't be increasing the stability of the area.
They might not recognize it, but they have enough troubles that they will not pursue a conflict with the Kurds.
Contrary to almost every one of its neighbours, Saudi-Arabia is a prosperous country with no civil strife, rule of law*, and extensive social services. I don't quite see why you are singling them out as something other than a force of stability and order, in a region that could desperately need some more stability and order right now.
*not a law I like, but: lex dura sed lex
They have law and order themselves (of a sort, important Arabs can get away with murder), but they export destruction to other countries. Either they do it as a nation, or wealthy and well-connected Saudi subjects do it on their own accord.
Every nation that feels rich and self-righteous about its values exports violence by the bucketloads. That's sadly how the world works: You support vile people abroad, so they fight the other vile people who dare to oppose your sacred values.
Saudi-Arabia is no worse than the USA (who turned Latin America into a warzone in the name of "war on drugs", and Iraq into a true and proper hellhouse in the name of anti-terrorism and democracy) or the former USSR (for whom no tyranny or rebel movement was ever too vile, as long as they professed to be true Marxists).
Saudi-Arabia has managed to hold its own country amazingly stable and prosperous considering what kind of region they live in, and what a sort of rebellious people the Arab tribes in that region have traditionally been. As a nation-building experiment, Saudi-Arabia has been super successful, and the middle east would be a better place if the more secular nation-building in Syria, Iraq or Yemen had been only half as successful as them.