How in the heck does giving some very minor nations some great ideas (including coring costs) warrant increases in relation limits? These forum posters are on some crazy kool aid lately.
National Ideagroups - 13th of October - C
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
How in the heck does giving some very minor nations some great ideas (including coring costs) warrant increases in relation limits? These forum posters are on some crazy kool aid lately.
If you pay attention to the big picture, they're also adding multiple subject nation types that target subject empires instead of single tag empires. A lot of what's been said really sounds like they want you to grow through subjects rather than annexing everything in sight. That can't be done with tight limits on relations, because you can't afford to keep them around.
Also, while some of these nations might just seem small to you, Georgia especially is in a very key location separating the Ottomans from Russia. I wouldn't call that minor.
Romania most likely won't have its own ideas in order to inherit the ideas from the forming state. Just a guess, we need to wait for the release.
With one of the empires being you, that makes them a perfect march to keep Ottomans/Russia/Austria-HRE from spreading further into the balkans. Georgia might serve the same between Ottomans/Russia/Timurids. If you aren't active in the region, why do you care about some small nations at the other end of the world?
Or Conquest, at all. If you want to RP, fine, but quasi-historical determinism isn't a good justification for bad mechanics.
Relevant to the fact that it's a conquest game, and it appears as though the developers are trying to create an additional path of conquest. It was just a simple question. I have no idea why you've decided you need to troll the hell out of it. I am actually looking for how this might be an interesting change rather than one that simply adds more costs and wait time if you choose to go after them.
Wallachia ideas, Yey!
Thank you paradox
Legacy of the Impaler: +1 Shock for Generals, +1
Thank you paradox
Legacy of the Impaler: +1 Shock for Generals, +1
Somebody less lazy than me/has more time than me should make a comprehensive thread that will includes all of these National Idea threads.
These are all countries which were stubbornly independent. They're Marches waiting to happen.
Given Serbia has worse ideas in AOW - and even pre AOW when it had better ideas it somehow failed more than Wallachia, at least in my games - and it is close to expansive Italy/Austria while still being too close to Ottomans - I suppose Wallachia will be stronger :0
Boost Serbian ideas
I agree. Especially +5% cavalry combat ability. What the hell is the point of this NI - it looks almost sarcastic when contrasted with its name: 'Homeland of Hussars'.
It should be +15%.
I always vassalise them even if I dont play in the region.I just like to see them on the map or actually I just want to see them orthodox since ottoderps convert everything.