Napoleón's Community

[unmerged(6147)]

Heh, it just might be possible that I am not the ideal Austria o

On the other hand, if I had not sucked as much I would not have been on the receiving end of a 15 minute free of charge lecture by Tonioz about my shortcomings

Tonio, although you must have suffered a lot when you saw my actions I believe your torment where far from what dago experienced some months ago when he was Prussia and I his ally in good old Austria. After that session poor dago's mental balance was so upside down he had to take one week's leave from EU MP.

And KJ in FRA must have loved this 2nd Nappy session because of me.

He who bringeth joy to his fellow mates is a true blessing they say...

PS The first Nappy with me in ENG worked decidedly better

 

[King John]

It was nice of you to let my leaders eat your armies, but you know, it's sometimes funner if they get to chase their prey a little bit first . Next time you'll know better I guess . I agree about England.

I was very happy to get to have a Russian campaign in a Nappy for once. And I don't think I let down the real Napoleon, lost only 150k or so in Russia and was able to take over Moscow, St Petersberg and a multitude of peasant villages.

That first drive into Bavaria was very good. I was surprised to see such a quick, and big attack. It would've proved disastrous for France if the Germans had assisted more.

 

[Tonioz]

France invasion to Russia by KJ in the second game at the end was fun
Germans were destroyed - for the time Austria was not attacked and tryed to recover, Prussia was completely assaulted, so Davoit had fun to come to Russia

Well, that is totally useless to fight leaderless vs Davoit or Nappy. For example, when Suvorov died, his 68K army was annihilated in next battle for 1 day :rofl:

Coming Suvorov in first five year to germans was because i wanted to support german defence, but only saw that they miss Bavaria, and suddenly found myself on the frontline. First four years i invested in LT51, so couldn`t build cannons. Of course i could send Suvorov to OE in 1795 and steamroll them, but then Nappy would annex germans in 1797 already i suppose

Well, in general imo England, Austria, Prussia and Russia are easily beating nappy coalition if property played and coordinated.

 

[unmerged(38752)]

Yes, well, I learned from yesterday that I still suck quite a bit at war. Though I do not suck as hard as Daniel Meh, I need practise.

 

[unmerged(45041)]

Chill guys. I was the suck god of yesterdays nappy!
I minted from the start, but should have build up a greater force for Blucher for him to be safe in. When nap himself came to visist he blew everything up to pieces. But I will learn from my misstakes hopefully! Thanks for letting me play guys! I need more of those "learning sessions".

 

[unmerged(6147)]

In the 2nd game it was

FRA+SPA+OE+(HOL...AI?) vs ENG+PRU+RUS+AUS. I believe that is unbalanced.

FRA+SPA+HOL vs the same 4 is OK.

4 vs 3 or 3 vs 2. The latter could be FRA+HOL vs ENG+PRU+AUS.

Really those of you who have played the Nappy several times should know what is OK setups and what is not. Just tell the rest of us here in the thread. Why not in post number 1.

Tell us the ideal setup for

5 human players
6 ditto
7 ditto
8 ditto
9 ditto
10 ditto

Of course pressuppoing equal player strength in all nations.

Pibe and dago, what do the two of you suggest?

 

[unmerged(38752)]

Seems like everyone in those nappies sucked but Tonioz and KJ

 

[unmerged(6147)]

Well Ozzeh, you just named two of that handful players or so who can claim to be the foremost warriors in our community. It was no newbies that played FRA in our two Nappies last night. The rest of us was mere cannon fodder

 

[Van Engel]

In the 2nd game it was

FRA+SPA+OE+(HOL...AI?) vs ENG+PRU+RUS+AUS. I believe that is unbalanced.

FRA+SPA+HOL vs the same 4 is OK.

4 vs 3 or 3 vs 2. The latter could be FRA+HOL vs ENG+PRU+AUS.

Really those of you who have played the Nappy several times should know what is OK setups and what is not. Just tell the rest of us here in the thread. Why not in post number 1.

Tell us the ideal setup for

5 human players
6 ditto
7 ditto
8 ditto
9 ditto
10 ditto

Of course pressuppoing equal player strength in all nations.

Pibe and dago, what do the two of you suggest?

I know you didn't ask me but I would suggest:

4 players: FRA vs ENG, PRU, HAB (slightly unfair for the allies though)
5 players: FRA vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS (slightly infavour of the allies)
6 players: FRA, HOL vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS (balanced imo)
7 players: FRA, HOL, SPA vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS (slightly infavour of FRA)
8 players: FRA, HOL, SPA vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS, SWE (again, balanced imo)
9 players: FRA, HOL, SPA, OE vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS, SWE (slightly in favour of FRA)
10 players: IMO, no balanced solution (unless you have USA on the allies side ofcourse...)

 

[unmerged(17489)]

I know you didn't ask me but I would suggest:

4 players: FRA vs ENG, PRU, HAB (slightly unfair for the allies though)
5 players: FRA vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS (slightly infavour of the allies)
6 players: FRA, HOL vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS (balanced imo)

The rest of the countries are neutral and can pick up whatever side they choose. I would add a 7 players: FRA, HOL, BAV vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS first though.

 

[Van Engel]

The rest of the countries are neutral and can pick up whatever side they choose. I would add a 7 players: FRA, HOL, BAV vs ENG, PRU, HAB, RUS first though.

Owhyeah that Bavaria Nappy was fun.

 

[unmerged(11287)]

do you think Bavaria has a future in a Nappy?

 

[unmerged(17489)]

do you think Bavaria has a future in a Nappy?

they must ally with France but yeah, they do and can be quite a good small boost for the French alliance (who always seems to lose )

 

[unmerged(11287)]

As France I'd annex it, friendly or not I would

Spain's shitty too, they can change their mind and invade France from the south. I'd take them too! I can only trust in NL.

 

[unmerged(17489)]

As France I'd annex it, friendly or not I would

but you're a vnetter, honey have you ever tried letting them live and partition the German states together with them? The extra diplomats in the beginning is worth it alone imho. They get much more manpower from the German provinces than France would too and their commanders are okay.

Spain otoh, I agree with you. They are nothing else than cannon fodder

 

[Van Engel]

but you're a vnetter, honey have you ever tried letting them live and partition the German states together with them? The extra diplomats in the beginning is worth it alone imho. They get much more manpower from the German provinces than France would too and their commanders are okay.

Spain otoh, I agree with you. They are nothing else than cannon fodder

You should vassalize Spain anyway.

 

[unmerged(11287)]

but you're a vnetter, honey have you ever tried letting them live and partition the German states together with them? The extra diplomats in the beginning is worth it alone imho. They get much more manpower from the German provinces than France would too and their commanders are okay.

Spain otoh, I agree with you. They are nothing else than cannon fodder

you're hot o

I have NL as a diplomat manantial.

 

[Dago]

which version r u playing?
everybody that has played the 3b version (not much tested by me) is free to post ideas for changes
when i ll have some time,i wanna make the 4th version (and i hope the last)

 

[unmerged(38752)]

We have been playing 3b Dago, but I'm not really in a position to comment yet (as I've lost every nappy I played this week )

 

[unmerged(45041)]

I would really love to play more nappys than I do... Last nights session really showed me the need for practice.
So, plz mess me if you need players...

ICQ: 218919323