Napoleon Add-on?

[Zanza]

Now that Paradox seems to have a new strategy and offers add-ons to its existing games, what's the likelihood that we'll eventually see a Napoleon add-on to EU3? I think it's extremely likely because the Napoleonic time frame is very interesting and so it should sell well. Depends a bit on if the engine is able to handle it, but I guess it should be.

 

[Jayavarman]

A little early to be discussing expansions, eh? While I think Paradox's trend of releasing expansions is cool, I want Napoleon and the Revolutions to have their own game.

 

[unmerged(53986)]

Now that Paradox seems to have a new strategy and offers add-ons to its existing games, what's the likelihood that we'll eventually see a Napoleon add-on to EU3? I think it's extremely likely because the Napoleonic time frame is very interesting and so it should sell well. Depends a bit on if the engine is able to handle it, but I guess it should be.

separate one, please.


Would have to be more like the hoi series.. but building on money rather than any ic. Industry would however be a source of wealth.

 

[Ayeshteni]

Now that Paradox seems to have a new strategy and offers add-ons to its existing games, what's the likelihood that we'll eventually see a Napoleon add-on to EU3? I think it's extremely likely because the Napoleonic time frame is very interesting and so it should sell well. Depends a bit on if the engine is able to handle it, but I guess it should be.

Good Grief, EU3 isn't even developed, never mind on the shelves yet!!

Ayeshteni

 

[Jayavarman]

Good Grief, EU3 isn't even developed, never mind on the shelves yet!!

Ayeshteni

Meh. I asked for an expansion for Crusader Kings before it was released, too.

 

[Ayeshteni]

Meh. I asked for an expansion for Crusader Kings before it was released, too.

and we are still waiting.

Aye.

 

[curtis]

Now that Paradox seems to have a new strategy and offers add-ons to its existing games, what's the likelihood that we'll eventually see a Napoleon add-on to EU3? I think it's extremely likely because the Napoleonic time frame is very interesting and so it should sell well. Depends a bit on if the engine is able to handle it, but I guess it should be.

I tend to agree with you on this, but I agree with Aye, it's waaaay too early for expansion talk.

 

[Eldin]

You derive policy from one incident? (doomsday)

 

[BiB]

Well, there's the Victoria expansion too now, which is what prompted this.

 

[Andrelvis]

I tend to agree with you on this, but I agree with Aye, it's waaaay too early for expansion talk.

Ooh, but expansion talk is interesting... We already know somewhat what will be in EU3, only not the specifics...

 

[yourworstnightm]

Any kind of expansion to Paradox games ought to be good, but I don't see a napoleonic add on to EUIII, the revolutionary era does not fit the EU engine, or the way you wage war in EU. I would rather see a own game for the french revolution and the Napoleonic wars. Or they could be included in Vicky II or Vicky Revolutions, since I think they would make more sense in Vicky anyway.

 

[Havard]

the revolutionary era does not fit the EU engine,

How do you know that?