The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
They confirmed in the first DD that it wasn’t Iberia.I was expecting Iberia,
You’re forgetting that Groogy was brought on board for this expansion, and @Groogy is a pretty big HRE fan.But considering how @Trin Tragula loves India, I'm still doubtful about an Imperial or Italian DLC.
It makes for a more strategical setting and a detailled map is always welcome, because EU4 is basically a province-based map-game.rework of the map is usually just a nerf to the dev in the old states, making nations there spend more state slots to state same land.
for all i care, they shouldn't do these map reworks.
if i see new ireland states, i think "worthless" immediatly, whereas it was two really good states before, making stating ireland and accepting culture worthwile.
either they reform entire map at once, or nothing...
vein hope, but oh well![]()
I’d be surprised if it were just Italy. Groogy has said last week it will be a larger expansion the size of CoC or RoM. As much stuff there is to add in Italy, I don’t see it as being enough to be of the same size as those expansions. HRE and Italy just go together too well, and both areas share a bit in common, not to mention they both could use more provinces, tags, ideas, and unit packs (Savoy especially so).Sounds plausible. I hope the update is not limited to Italy, but to the HRE and its surroundings in general. Just like with 1.23, which had ~80 new provinces.
Updated Savoy. I'm all for it.
If it is northern Italy, even mostly spreading around dev SHOULD still result in high dev total provinces. As it stands, the area is just flatly inferior to Northern India and the low country to Brittany stretch. This region ought to be second only to China's seaboard.rework of the map is usually just a nerf to the dev in the old states, making nations there spend more state slots to state same land.
for all i care, they shouldn't do these map reworks.
if i see new ireland states, i think "worthless" immediatly, whereas it was two really good states before, making stating ireland and accepting culture worthwile.
either they reform entire map at once, or nothing...
vein hope, but oh well![]()
Since development is an average of 1444-1821, I’d argue the Low Countries should be on par with Northern Italy.If it is northern Italy, even mostly spreading around dev SHOULD still result in high dev total provinces. As it stands, the area is just flatly inferior to Northern India and the low country to Brittany stretch. This region ought to be second only to China's seaboard.
Ireland was only good when minors pumped dev. Too much grain and fish before.
Why would Bengal be part of a very eurocentric looking change to governmental system? I reckon the expansion will be called the prince, and hopefully focus on Italy and the Italian wars.Just a reminder that it could easily be the Bengal Delta, too.
Kind of a random question... Are your graphics not at max or did the water get an HD facelift? The picture DDRJake gave us looks a lot better, it actually has whitecaps.![]()
Here Ticino in 1.25 map:
![]()
Hahahahahahahaha.government rework fits as a smaller feature
Well, I certainly hope you're right about it being Italy and surroundings.Why would Bengal be part of a very eurocentric looking change to governmental system? I reckon the expansion will be called the prince, and hopefully focus on Italy and the Italian wars.
It would make me squeek with excitement. Better brace for dissapointmentWell, I certainly hope you're right about it being Italy and surroundings.