Unless they do something about it, they are stuck marrying other jews. The same situation as the Zoroastrian have.
'Must not marry an infidel'
- Thread starter thegreatjam
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
Unless they do something about it, they are stuck marrying other jews. The same situation as the Zoroastrian have.
In fairness, Judaism is the ultimate "only marry your own correligionists" religion.
The jews will likely be in the same situation "the rest" is. Whether or not things are fixed.
I don't think that was the case for the Khazars (but I might be wrong).
Yeah. Generally, converts, or nobles in situations in which they were surrounded by infidel religions were much, much, more likely to marry across faith.
+1
It doesn't make much sense to have a modifier that makes interreligious marriages impossible, even when you are at maximum relations.
Making it possible but adding a piety hit seems more realistic.
The same thing with inviting infidels to court. Religion played an important role in Middle Ages, but definitely less important than titles. Adding "I would give you one of my duchies if you converted to my faith" mechanics would be great. Maybe add a diplomatic option that would allow demanding conversion and subsequent invitation to court?
It doesn't make much sense to have a modifier that makes interreligious marriages impossible, even when you are at maximum relations.
Making it possible but adding a piety hit seems more realistic.
The same thing with inviting infidels to court. Religion played an important role in Middle Ages, but definitely less important than titles. Adding "I would give you one of my duchies if you converted to my faith" mechanics would be great. Maybe add a diplomatic option that would allow demanding conversion and subsequent invitation to court?
Unfortunately, No. Thats part of the reason people were surprised by the update. Even the big mods, like the GoT one have said Its hardcoded.
+1 by the way.
Last edited:
If there were, we wouldn't be complaining as much. I for one am against any subsequent arbitrary hardcoded changes, such as this intermarriage ban and that strict child number limit based on court size/expected average number of kids.
+1, by the way.
The devs ignoring this issue since very beginning, so not much hope left.
Have to mention, I somehow had an heir who married a Sunni. Likely caused by when my Amalfi conquered Sicily.
Responding to anything in particular, or just being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian?
Responding to anything in particular, or just being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian?
Last edited:
Illanair timing seems to imply him responding to:
+1
I do miss my mass rebellions from inheriting large swaths of land ruled by infidels.
I do miss my mass rebellions from inheriting large swaths of land ruled by infidels.
+1
It should really be moddable. I used to challenge myself my suddenly converting to Islam in europe and see if I could make it.
It should really be moddable. I used to challenge myself my suddenly converting to Islam in europe and see if I could make it.
+1
I agreed with the idea preferably in neighboring situations. That's make sense and could be implemented by a modifier to be difficult but not impossible. Think in Taifas kingdoms in Spain, they were alliances and conversions between Christians and Muslims rulers there for sure...
I agreed with the idea preferably in neighboring situations. That's make sense and could be implemented by a modifier to be difficult but not impossible. Think in Taifas kingdoms in Spain, they were alliances and conversions between Christians and Muslims rulers there for sure...
- Status