Well, I hope - since beginnings of this thread - that they at least give us their statement. My hope is still unfounded, as of now ;P
'Must not marry an infidel'
- Thread starter thegreatjam
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
We can only hope, even if the CK2 patch will be coming out towards the end of the year.
Actually curious as to what the "signed" counter would be at this point, but sadly, my internet is running a little slow right now to check.
+1! (and i made a bug report about the intermarry parameter not really working, as it only works within the same religious group.)
Given the lack of information released about the topic, there's still a possibility that restricting the parameter to the same religious group may be intentional, for all we know, at least.
Isn't all the "intermarry" parameter does removing the --- penalty for not being the exact same religion? There's no reason to expect it to remove the unsurmountable penalty for being of different religion groups.
Apparently, something along those lines, yes, though that's not what I at least would have understood from announcement (though not the patch notes, which are in line with what you said).
I work around this by "kidnapping" non-heiresses.
(Open console and then "move <charid>")
I work around this by "kidnapping" non-heiresses.
(Open console and then "move <charid>")
Because clearly, the only problem with the high infidel penalty is that the Norse can't marry Malinese pagans easily enough, not that the Norse can't marry a neighbouring Christian courtier.
All the "intermarry" parameter does is allow reformed norse to marry old norse without penalty.
With regard to the West Africans, they should have a "too far away" penalty. I'd make the tooltip text for it say "who the hell are you?"
Also, the only thing a gods-fearing pagan needs to do with Christians is kill them. Marrying them is highly immoral, historical as it might be.
With regard to the West Africans, they should have a "too far away" penalty. I'd make the tooltip text for it say "who the hell are you?"
Also, the only thing a gods-fearing pagan needs to do with Christians is kill them. Marrying them is highly immoral, historical as it might be.
It's historical and you should be able to marry them in game so that's that.
Seeing as there's likely a new patch coming out soon for the upcoming DLC i sure hope you have bothered to make this moddable in that patch :glare:
Based on the prevailing forum logic, I'd say that the upcoming patch/DLC should include the ability to for different religions to marry since sparkling vampires are romantic and they are obviously hinting that the DLC has to do with a romance update.
+1
It should be moddable as well, I have no qualms with modifying files to be able to illogically marry people of conflicting faiths, it would make playing as a Pagan easier.
It should be moddable as well, I have no qualms with modifying files to be able to illogically marry people of conflicting faiths, it would make playing as a Pagan easier.
Really simplistic suggestion: Make the -5 'no way, no how' only be for being an infidel AND being a different culture group.
Last edited:
For pagan faiths other than the Norse, there is almost no female courtiers other than randomly-generated ones (the Chiefs tend to not be married, either.) So your entire alliances exist only with priestesses, which tend to mean nothing in practical terms.
So are Jews going to be able to marry people of other religions? Or are they hard coded out of all that like the rest?
- Status