• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Resurr3ction

First Lieutenant
29 Badges
Jun 16, 2011
227
0
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife Pre-Order
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Cities: Skylines
  • 500k Club
This sort of true--you get a damage bonus by doing this, if I recall correctly. The thing is, if their very strong center can knock out your flanks individually, they will destroy them one by one and win. Dividing your troops over three flanks is only a good idea if each flank can stand up to their single flank on their own. Otherwise, you're letting them make use of the good old "divide and conquer" tactic.

I suspect it works like this - consider mercenaries who are just central flank - but who in their right mind could make it work like that? What are the other two flanks doing? Cheer-leading? Because otherwise it would be pretty much always preferable to have just one huge central flank and don't bother with the other two... Does any mod fix this btw?
 

Kimberly

Lt. General
31 Badges
Sep 16, 2012
1.694
400
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Semper Fi
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
I suspect it works like this - consider mercenaries who are just central flank - but who in their right mind could make it work like that? What are the other two flanks doing? Cheer-leading? Because otherwise it would be pretty much always preferable to have just one huge central flank and don't bother with the other two... Does any mod fix this btw?

If you have all three columns, and the enemy has just one column, all three columns will attack the central column--and I think the two flanks get a damage bonus in the process. The thing is, many small columns attacking one big column are less powerful than one big column attacking a small column; the big center column will be able to rout each enemy column one by one before their combined efforts can cause it to break, because its so large. Also keep in mind that if you have just one center column, you have no "weak link"--you can put your most powerful commander in that column, and not risk any of the flanks collapsing due to a poor commander. Similarly, if you use mercenaries, holy orders or some other very large subunit, you don't have to worry about dividing your troops unevenly over the columns.
 

unmerged(228153)

elephant in the room
4 Badges
Sep 22, 2010
102
0
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
This is why a small, but significant force of cavalry on one flank — not both flanks! — wins battles against the Fatimids: a column of knights is more than forty times stronger than a column of light infantry (provided they're the same in numbers and technology), based on the morale, defense and attack ratings. The flanking column can only be attacked at great costs, thus weakening the enemy in the center (where all their units are, including the Mameluke super-unit). The center columns face off against each other normally, but yours gets the flanking bonus. This can make up for tech and numerical deficits, as long as your number of knights is about 10% of the enemy's total army size (a guesstimate), and they're all stacked in the center column, which the Fatimids are prone to do.

Archers are good in theory vs. Fatimids because every battle opens with a skirmish, and the Muslim levies will be decimated from the get-go, but they suck massively against horse archers and heavy cavalry (read: Mamelukes). Really, you only need the archers because the Fatimids have so many, also courtesy of the Mamelukes, otherwise your infantry croaks too fast for your center column to hold the line while the flanking knights whittle the enemy down.

I repeat, heavy cavalry is the best. You need them. Light cavalry is usually good, but not against horse archers. You need those for strengthening the flank, and most importantly the post-battle mop-up phase. Archers are important because the enemy has tons of them. Pikes are mostly not so hot, because archers and horse archers ignore them. Light infantry are the meatshields. Heavy infantry are the backbone, but they're useless in skirmish.

EDIT: Light cavalry in a column without heavy cavalry can actually receive huge bonuses during skirmish (we're talking up to 300 percent). The trouble I've had with pure light-cav columns vs. the Fatimids is simply that horse archers ravage light cavalry, and the Fatimids have quite a lot of horse archers. Similarly, pure heavy-cav columns are usually routed too early, since they're rare and expensive units and you won't have a lot of them sitting around. That's why I'm usually forced to mix my cavalry stacks against the Fatimids.
 
Last edited: