The kids will be muslims, thats enough I guess.
That's actually what my muslim exgirlfriend told me.
edit: To clarify: Muslim man can marry whomever they want.
Aside from the gameplay perspective already explained by grommile, your 'historical' argument is pretty void. Some eastern despots (the Byzantines) married there daughters to muslim rulers. Representative? I think not. Name me any Iberian, Italian, French, Scandinavian, English, Scottisch, Irish, German, Polish, Lithuanian, Dutch, Bohemian - include all parts of catholic feudal Europe here - of whom royalty married a muslim ruler... '0'
How many Muslims made RM with Japanese - Shinto?
There are Turkish, Arabian, Berber, Algerian, Morrocan. include all parts of Sunni Islam around middle east. l think game's "historical" argument is pretty void not mine.
I would guess that his prospective wife is expected to convert on her wedding day if not before?
There's actually an event for Ethiopia about a Royal Marriage with Muslims that gives an adviser. I think at least Coptics should get royal marriages with Muslims, maybe even pagans. It'd make them more unique, since everyone complains about how they're so boring.
What are you replying to? I'm asking a very specific example to list me the number of RM between christians and muslims... You begin to sum up all sorts of people of muslim stock, proving you have not grasped my question. Let me restate it again, name me a:
- Bourbon who married a muslim?
- Valois who married a muslim?
- Hohenzollern who married a muslim?
- Habsburg who married a muslim?
- De Trastamara who married a muslim?
- Aviz who married a muslim?
- Braganza who married a muslim?
- Lancaster who married a muslim?
- York who married a muslim?
- Tudor who married a muslim?
- Stuart/Stewart who married a muslim?
- Orange who married a muslim?
- Wittselbach who married a muslim?
- Romanov who married a muslim?
- Vasa who married a muslim?
- Jagellion who married a muslim?
- etc [insert European royal lineages here]
- etc [insert European royal lineages here]
I'm asking you very specifically to list me the "many" examples of royal muslim-christian intermarriage during this period, as to prove a rule that this was actually a 'thing' and happened so very often - not the one exception of Byzantine rulers who were desperate to marry pretty much everything in their despondent state of decay... (for such things are termed 'the exception proving the rule')
You can't. The point is about the marriages of muslim and christian royalty. Shinto Japan has nothing to do with it and would only provide fake arguments not to the point - though probably correct in that it was never a thing either, but I'm not arguing Japan, I'm arguing christian Europe. I'm very specifically asking exhaustive proof by historical facts that this was a thing. I know of none.
What are you replying to? I'm asking a very specific example to list me the number of RM between christians and muslims... You begin to sum up all sorts of people of muslim stock, proving you have not grasped my question. Let me restate it again, name me a:
- Bourbon who married a muslim?
- Valois who married a muslim?
- Hohenzollern who married a muslim?
- Habsburg who married a muslim?
- De Trastamara who married a muslim?
- Aviz who married a muslim?
- Braganza who married a muslim?
- Lancaster who married a muslim?
- York who married a muslim?
- Tudor who married a muslim?
- Stuart/Stewart who married a muslim?
- Orange who married a muslim?
- Wittselbach who married a muslim?
- Romanov who married a muslim?
- Vasa who married a muslim?
- Jagellion who married a muslim?
- etc [insert European royal lineages here]
- etc [insert European royal lineages here]
I'm asking you very specifically to list me the "many" examples of royal muslim-christian intermarriage during this period, as to prove a rule that this was actually a 'thing' and happened so very often - not the one exception of Byzantine rulers who were desperate to marry pretty much everything in their despondent state of decay... (for such things are termed 'the exception proving the rule')
You can't. The point is about the marriages of muslim and christian royalty. Shinto Japan has nothing to do with it and would only provide fake arguments not to the point - though probably correct in that it was never a thing either, but I'm not arguing Japan, I'm arguing christian Europe. I'm very specifically asking exhaustive proof by historical facts that this was a thing. I know of none.
So then, a Lancaster or York never married with a Romanov, so lt should be forbidden in game?
A Braganza never married a Jagellion, it should be forbidden?
l support that, some marriage are not true in game. Countries never made marriage. In same point lt should be forbidden also for historical truth
Well, royal marriages between Shinto and Muslim doesn't really make much sense either, and Muslims were known to take Christian wives- usually from the Caucasus or Balkans, so there's a case for royal marriages between Muslims and Christian vassals. As far as I know, the Ming didn't really participate in royal marriages either- the Yuan's policy of marrying princes/princesses to vassals I think was seen as unusual.Strawman argument here dear sir, the question is of faith, not family. You are blatantly ignoring the point. Which still stands as you have not carried forward any conclusive proof of widespread royal/aristocratic intermarriage between the two faiths.
I await examples.
But we don't want it to be widespread where France royal marriages Mamluks every game. We ask for it to be possible so that you can strenghten ties with neighbouring/friendly muslim nations that are allies/vassals or whatever. It did happen in areas where muslims and christians lived together, not only in the population but among the royalty as well.Strawman argument here dear sir, the question is of faith, not family. You are blatantly ignoring the point. Which still stands as you have not carried forward any conclusive proof of widespread royal/aristocratic intermarriage between the two faiths.
I await examples.
But we don't want it to be widespread where France royal marriages Mamluks every game. We ask for it to be possible so that you can strenghten ties with neighbouring/friendly muslim nations that are allies/vassals or whatever. It did happen in areas where muslims and christians lived together, not only in the population but among the royalty as well.
We could just make it so that there is some more reluctance so that it only happens if they manage to get Friendly attitude or something similar with eachother.
With the current trend we have, Paradox will address Orthodox/Coptic later on. Recently Protestant and Buddhism were made unique, and I won't be surprised in the next DLC if Coptic and/or Confucian gets a buff.
Incidentally, it's kind of weird that a dead religion (Norse) now has more flavour than a number of religions that do appear in the standard 1444 scenario (Coptic, Confucian, Tengri, Animist, Shamanist, Totemist...) Scandinavian bias I suppose![]()
Even if it was an exception, does that really warrant an 100% NEVER in all circumstances? If the circumstances are right it should be a possibility.If it did happen, why is everyone reluctant to give examples other than that of a Byzantine princess and some Coptic tribe in faraway Ethiopia?