I committed a bunch of culture technology points to Tolerance VI and spent twenty minutes balancing my budget with the objective of law reform without giving up too many liability or confederate favors. The goal was to hold a large duchy and its county titles for less than a year after a vassal's accidental death. I wanted to give these titles to my ruler's aunt, who has truly stacked diplomacy, bringing her to direct subject and powerful vassal status at a juncture when a master chancellor is sorely wanted.
It turns out this is just another hard-learned Conclave feature, and I can't grant her the title. Anyways, the productive element of this post is suggesting changing the tooltip for Civic and Religious Law § Status of Women. It signs:
"Full Status of Women: Powerful legislation removing old restrictions has finally had the effect of affecting the general opinion on women in positions of power across society."
Aside from clunky phraseology evidently written by someone eager to explore the affect-effect distinction the tip is misleading. It's a law that changes opinion without changing institutions? Surely that's a bogus notion. Sounds like some Trujillato, Kim-dynasty regime shit. Let's get our act together Paradox, it makes no sense.
It turns out this is just another hard-learned Conclave feature, and I can't grant her the title. Anyways, the productive element of this post is suggesting changing the tooltip for Civic and Religious Law § Status of Women. It signs:
"Full Status of Women: Powerful legislation removing old restrictions has finally had the effect of affecting the general opinion on women in positions of power across society."
Aside from clunky phraseology evidently written by someone eager to explore the affect-effect distinction the tip is misleading. It's a law that changes opinion without changing institutions? Surely that's a bogus notion. Sounds like some Trujillato, Kim-dynasty regime shit. Let's get our act together Paradox, it makes no sense.
- 3
