• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(3571)

Devil incarnate
May 2, 2001
1.905
0
Visit site
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Victory Points, 1709 - 1808

Originally posted by satan
You'll have to ask Dave to explain his logic, but I think part of the idea was to help even out the VPs.

If the missions weren't broken I think they could be fun, (especially such things as "remove Spain from Italy" etc), but I agree, they are somewhat messed up.

Perhaps the random ones from dynamic missions, at least that way you can't pick the easy ones. Anyway, like I said, I am sure Dave can explain better what he was thinking.

Just noticed (while trying to investigate the vs. Russians battle debacle) that the missions file is editable. That's another possibility to help make them work - we could remove all the "keep such and such" ones. Probably not worth the effort though.
 

unmerged(8301)

Sea slug
Mar 18, 2002
413
0
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Victory Points, 1709 - 1808

Originally posted by satan
Just noticed (while trying to investigate the vs. Russians battle debacle) that the missions file is editable. That's another possibility to help make them work - we could remove all the "keep such and such" ones. Probably not worth the effort though.

Well, in my humble opinion, none of them work. The most interesting of the bunch, the "Conquer x" and "No x in y" missions, are essentially impossible to accomplish because of the 5 year time limit they impose. Since our wars generally last at least 10-15 years, not counting time to prepare for them, there's no way to succeed.

However, if removing missions is possible, I would support removing all of them. That way we don't have to go hunting through save files trying to catch people taking missions. :D
 

unmerged(3571)

Devil incarnate
May 2, 2001
1.905
0
Visit site
Originally posted by KlevesWarrior
You have not really been greedy, but you do have more of Germany than I do. And I think, more of Europe.

Mostly because the Dutch betrayed me, and you have more of Italy (which is more valuable I think). Plus, I gave the Dutch Belgium right away, rather than waiting over 100 years :p
 

unmerged(3571)

Devil incarnate
May 2, 2001
1.905
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Shigure
Yes, I was very surprised that the French offered no assistance to the defence of the Lowlands, and I think letting you die so easily was a strategic and diplomatic mistake on his part. We shall see what happens, I suppose. I wish I had known ahead of time that France would offer you no help -- I would have invaded years ago before Sweden and Poland joined the fray. :D

Well, all things considered about how much help I got from the French and how they are the ones that set me up to begin with, I am more than willing to peace out. I think you occupy 100% of my provinces anyway :D
 
Jul 18, 2002
627
0
Visit site
Hessen

To Satan---It was very unnecessary to attack and devour Hessen. I politely asked you not to do it, and you ignored me. I can only assume that you thought Sweden was so helpless one-on-one that you had no need to consider listening. Sweden is too weak to take on the Netherlands one-on-one but we all knew a general war was coming. It is silly, I think, to just insist that you "needed" these provinces.

It was obvious that an all-out war was coming any day, and you seemed to go out of your way to antagonize Sweden. Sweden may be rather weak economically, but its land tech and army are not negligible, and it was completely pointless, in my opinion, to piss it off for a dubious "necessary" land grab.

In addition, you indicate that we had agreed on spheres of influence long ago. Your memory is not accurate. You INFORMED me long ago, that my sphere of influence was in eastern Europe beyond the Elbe, which leaves all of Germany to you. I specifically and vociferously disagreed then, as I do now and always will.

I believe that the attack on Hessen was a serious mistake on the part of the Netherlands. I was considering my options, and actually had other ideas in mind, until the Hessen fiasco. After that, I was determined to join or support whatever coalition the Netherlands was NOT in, and see what could be done about Dutch arrogance.

I think that France and the Netherlands discounted the East completely and made a serious, and probably fatal, error in so doing. I certainly never received any overtures from either power, only attacks from the Dutch---it can't be any surprise that Sweden entered the war against the Dutch as soon as possible, as the Hessian land grab guaranteed my entry.

You may say my entry into the war was "mindless" and it may very well be that I have no mind:) , but my entry makes perfect sense to me, as should the entry of Poland. Austria is inscrutable, as always.
 

unmerged(7580)

An Officer and a Gentleman
Feb 2, 2002
1.712
0
Visit site
This is how the action against the Dutch was decided:

Me: "So, are you planning any action against the Dutch?"

Shig: "I wouldn't mind."

Elijah: "Sure. What goals?"

Was this instigation?

I told the Dutch, they said they were not prepared, so I asked the English/Spanish to wait until 1802 (as it turns out, it took more time than that).

I also asked the Spanish if they woudl send troops north to fight the Dutch, so it would have been an even more devastating victory. Of course, they moved no troops, so I did not inform the Dutch.

Also, France's war was winnable, but when Poland, Sweden and Russia joined out of grievences against the Dutch, it was over for them. You can hardly blame this on France.
 

unmerged(3571)

Devil incarnate
May 2, 2001
1.905
0
Visit site
Re: Hessen

Originally posted by TAF
To Satan---It was very unnecessary to attack and devour Hessen. I politely asked you not to do it, and you ignored me. I can only assume that you thought Sweden was so helpless one-on-one that you had no need to consider listening. Sweden is too weak to take on the Netherlands one-on-one but we all knew a general war was coming. It is silly, I think, to just insist that you "needed" these provinces.

It was obvious that an all-out war was coming any day, and you seemed to go out of your way to antagonize Sweden. Sweden may be rather weak economically, but its land tech and army are not negligible, and it was completely pointless, in my opinion, to piss it off for a dubious "necessary" land grab.

In addition, you indicate that we had agreed on spheres of influence long ago. Your memory is not accurate. You INFORMED me long ago, that my sphere of influence was in eastern Europe beyond the Elbe, which leaves all of Germany to you. I specifically and vociferously disagreed then, as I do now and always will.

I believe that the attack on Hessen was a serious mistake on the part of the Netherlands. I was considering my options, and actually had other ideas in mind, until the Hessen fiasco. After that, I was determined to join or support whatever coalition the Netherlands was NOT in, and see what could be done about Dutch arrogance.

I think that France and the Netherlands discounted the East completely and made a serious, and probably fatal, error in so doing. I certainly never received any overtures from either power, only attacks from the Dutch---it can't be any surprise that Sweden entered the war against the Dutch as soon as possible, as the Hessian land grab guaranteed my entry.

You may say my entry into the war was "mindless" and it may very well be that I have no mind:) , but my entry makes perfect sense to me, as should the entry of Poland. Austria is inscrutable, as always.

I never said it was mindless, and I never saw any requests not to attack Hesse. However, I did see your allying Hesse initially (the first war with Hesse) to be a deliberate provocation, but I just assumed that you had been bought long ago by Spain.

I made no attempt to touch Brandenburg, which clearly is in your influence, but if you don't think the Reform provinces around the Rhine are more in my sphere than yours, I don't know what you're smoking. Also, it was quite clear that Hesse expanded at the expense of my vassal.

I guess we will just agree to disagree, but Hesse was never your ally until you joined them after Austria's doW and the English/French treachery. You showed then your hostile intent, despite much that Holland attempted to do for Sweden in the past.

If you can't see why I wanted a land connection to Palatinate I'm not sure what game you're playing... not EU2 that's for sure. It may not be your fault that I lost that connection in the first place, but you were clearly trying to hinder me, not help yourselft, which is a pretty hostile action. Don't pretend you were going to stay neutral when you had already attacked me by allying with Hesse during the first gang-bang.

Edit - I didn't mean the above to sound harsh, but clearly I needed a land connection to Palatinate, and the only way to do that was through Hesse. In unreasonably trying to prevent this you showed that you were obviously going to attack me anyway. I certainly never discounted any nation in this game, and for the most part tried to help those who were behind (Austria for instance, Sweden and Russia when they were attacked by Poland, OE, etc). If I wanted hostilities with Sweden I would have pushed that previous war further.

Edit #2 - Sweden informed me that it's sphere of influence was all the ports on the Baltic. I accepted that.

Edit #3 - I'm far from saying that I played a perfect game, or even a good one, but I don't think I made a mistake here, or took anybody too lightly. I would say in hindsight that I made a big mistake a long time ago in backing an ally and friend at the time (England) even if only diplomatically, against a friend (Sweden). Since then I haven't seen much of an attempt from Sweden to do anything but destroy me, though it seems that England was the one that caused much of Sweden's problems.
 
Last edited:

unmerged(3571)

Devil incarnate
May 2, 2001
1.905
0
Visit site
Originally posted by KlevesWarrior
This is how the action against the Dutch was decided:

Me: "So, are you planning any action against the Dutch?"

Shig: "I wouldn't mind."

Elijah: "Sure. What goals?"

Was this instigation?

I told the Dutch, they said they were not prepared, so I asked the English/Spanish to wait until 1802 (as it turns out, it took more time than that).

I also asked the Spanish if they woudl send troops north to fight the Dutch, so it would have been an even more devastating victory. Of course, they moved no troops, so I did not inform the Dutch.

Also, France's war was winnable, but when Poland, Sweden and Russia joined out of grievences against the Dutch, it was over for them. You can hardly blame this on France.

France alone could have defeated Spain. Netherlands alone would have a decent chance to fight off the East if it could use its navy. The reason that France is now faced with losing is that the Netherlands is gone, and it had no hope of surviving a war again England and Spain. Your only chance to win this was to avoid this exact situation, which you promoted. You didn't need the Netherlands to beat up on Spain, the Netherlands couldn't help vs. England, so what did you accomplish by this? You just managed to destroy an ally. If that was your goal, then you accomplished it.

The point being that this is no way helped you, only hurt me. Sometimes being too devious is a serious drawback.
 

unmerged(7580)

An Officer and a Gentleman
Feb 2, 2002
1.712
0
Visit site
Originally posted by satan
France alone could have defeated Spain. Netherlands alone would have a decent chance to fight off the East if it could use its navy. The reason that France is now faced with losing is that the Netherlands is gone, and it had no hope of surviving a war again England and Spain. Your only chance to win this was to avoid this exact situation, which you promoted. You didn't need the Netherlands to beat up on Spain, the Netherlands couldn't help vs. England, so what did you accomplish by this? You just managed to destroy an ally. If that was your goal, then you accomplished it.

The point being that this is no way helped you, only hurt me. Sometimes being too devious is a serious drawback.

Well, your plan was: The Dutch might fight, and they might fund France. And that was after I return every province I took from you.

This way, you did fight. ;)

Perhaps a mistake, but a move that would have payed off, had the east stuck to their pleged neutrality.
 

unmerged(8301)

Sea slug
Mar 18, 2002
413
0
Originally posted by satan
France alone could have defeated Spain. Netherlands alone would have a decent chance to fight off the East if it could use its navy. The reason that France is now faced with losing is that the Netherlands is gone, and it had no hope of surviving a war again England and Spain. Your only chance to win this was to avoid this exact situation, which you promoted. You didn't need the Netherlands to beat up on Spain, the Netherlands couldn't help vs. England, so what did you accomplish by this? You just managed to destroy an ally. If that was your goal, then you accomplished it.

The point being that this is no way helped you, only hurt me. Sometimes being too devious is a serious drawback.

Not to say that this whole affair was a good plan for France, but I would point out that he was essentially trapped in the France/England/Spain alliance. Since he was alliance leader, he couldn't leave; since he had no casus belli on either England or Spain, he couldn't ban us. It was quite impossible for him to declare war on Spain without somehow getting Spain or England to call for allies, so he could dishonour. Come to think of it, Spain should have just taken on the Netherlands one-on-one without calling. France wouldn't be able to do anything about it. :D
 

unmerged(3571)

Devil incarnate
May 2, 2001
1.905
0
Visit site
Originally posted by KlevesWarrior
Well, your plan was: The Dutch might fight, and they might fund France. And that was after I return every province I took from you.

This way, you did fight. ;)

Perhaps a mistake, but a move that would have payed off, had the east stuck to their pleged neutrality.

But even if the Netherlands didn't fight, you would have been getting money and would have a secure front. Now you have neither. There is no point in forcing me to fight if that fighting doesn't help you at all! I really don't see what you had to gain, but I see a lot that you had to lose.
 

Mem de Sá

Brazilian Lone Knight
61 Badges
Mar 29, 2003
1.377
0
Visit site
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • BATTLETECH
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife Pre-Order
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Empire of Sin
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Rome Gold
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
Originally posted by satan
Mostly because the Dutch betrayed me, and you have more of Italy (which is more valuable I think). Plus, I gave the Dutch Belgium right away, rather than waiting over 100 years :p

:rolleyes:

Great ending.
So it will be 12 years of war till 1820 :)
 

unmerged(8301)

Sea slug
Mar 18, 2002
413
0
Originally posted by manitou333
Hey guys who subbed for Russia and when did Russia do? I'm hearing that Russia fought in Europe, was I horrably savaged? :)

Mike D.

ackron subbed for you, and joined in the massive anti-French alliance. He participated in the invasion of the Netherlands, and so far as I know, was successful at it. Russia proper is so far from the front lines that you needn't worry, anyway.
 

unmerged(7580)

An Officer and a Gentleman
Feb 2, 2002
1.712
0
Visit site
Originally posted by satan
But even if the Netherlands didn't fight, you would have been getting money and would have a secure front. Now you have neither. There is no point in forcing me to fight if that fighting doesn't help you at all! I really don't see what you had to gain, but I see a lot that you had to lose.

Well, I prefer a ally that will certainly fight, to one that might fight.

And you also said something to the effect of: I don't know how much I can fund France, if I'm rebuilding my navy at the same time.

So I could not count on you to fight, or fund me (you probably would have sent something though), and I lose 3 provinces as well.

It was probably a mistake, though. ;)
 
Jul 18, 2002
627
0
Visit site
Navy

Satan, you should have left me with a navy. ;)

You destroyed my entire little navies on at least three separate occasions, which effectively channelled me into a purely continental focus. At one stage, I had grandiose ideas about landing a huge army into English North America and making hay while the sun shone, (I was counting up the TPs I would burn for one thing) but the complete and utter destruction of my navy on the first two occasions I met the Dutch fleet put paid to that idea. I would have loved to carry it out, however. I think it would have been very successful if done when I wanted to do it. Time passes, however, and that idea went into the dustbin.

As you noted earlier, Sweden has not been a naval power for a very, very long time.

My "mindless" joke was not a response to any comments by you at all, but was in response to Kleves assertions that the Eastern nations joined into the fray "mindlessly" because they were bored, but my statement was not clear in that regard. It should have been in a separate note, or made more clear that it related to Kleves comments on the East.
 

Count Drew

General
12 Badges
Jan 14, 2003
1.980
159
Visit site
  • Darkest Hour
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife Pre-Order
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
Not a bad job of continueing the Rightous Debate posts. You can see where each nation has had a gripe towards another and how they developed. It was totally wrong to destroy the Netherlands, Stab is not relevent nor even neutrality to some point, I don't see anyone holding a knife to your throat to destroy the Dutch Kleves. Participation is!<#1 participator was France> Netherlands and Sweden are natural enemies, I'm not shocked by either of their moves. I was on the offensive in Germany, if not for Sweden intervening and the French<my partial enemy at the time> 3-4 Germans would have come back to the HRE. Timing must have been poor, for I most DEFINITELY ASSURE you TAF, you'd of been fighting against French, Dutch and Austrians when the War was decided long long before My attempted Invasion of Poland. And the French would've slaughtered Swedes wholesale and backed Dutch aggression 100%, and that would've been that... Sweden acted defensively at some point. Though BLOODY BB DOWed me if you don't remeber and captured one of my Flag covered Cores! :p Bad enough 2 MP player has them, now and an AI too?<I doubt anyone in this game would stand for such a thing besides the downtrotten Austrians>

When it comes to the OE, I could turn to the West. Spain didn't give me an installment to prevent Bankruptcy when I requested it direly. Perhaps he saw a more formidable ally with the OE, with my early poor performance. Although the OE was the first to approach me with Land Grants, Ducat aide, and a possible future plan to retake Territory stolen by the West<even possibility of return of some Polish captured Provinces<Poland resisted the idea of releasing any of his captured territory, which preticipated our War later, even steven sort of thing> So naturally where would you turn as me? East..... Only reason I left the East was I couldn't afford these atrocious Wars, my leadership and MA to Eastern borders my only real use. Still having a decent LT France forced me to swear fealty by DOWing OE and retaking 2 provinces. I didn't go about a War of Hell against OE. I did it quite carefully. Took meager provinces and returned to status Quo aside from being a Battleground much later... The inclusion of Austria by the West was in a grand Plan to crush the Powers of Old<symbolic changing of the guard> and hailing in the Powers of The New. Although the Powers of new are now at each other's throat for every bad deed done. When indeed many look out for the welfare of their Nation... France threw away this victory... The Old Dutch Fleet could've stalled England long enough to win a victory. Complete Support of Austria would have drawn a frontline for the East to Cross. Giving him just the amount of time with my leaders and even tech East to conquor Spain Entirely... Thus Errors we make



It's not too big at this point to -all mission points. Some are tedious I know but apparently I'm not the only abuser and not the only one using Keep this or that territory. I think if you can conquor and hold a territory or Annex a nation you righteously deserve the VPs. Probably 1/5th of mine are such VPs.

In the Future I'd DEFINITELY like to see the inclusion of RP VPs... If we long to do things in such a way as to be historical. It seems we all agree on that. For instance if the Ottoman Empire Conquors and holds colonies in N.A, S.A, Far East, Austria-Oceanic that we penalize heavily the Powers of Britian and Spain... Etc.. Etc.. That way it would force peoples knowledge of the Map not to be abused :p Rather follow historical expansion areas



I
 

unmerged(7580)

An Officer and a Gentleman
Feb 2, 2002
1.712
0
Visit site
Well, when you're voting, remember: it took the entire world to bring France down. :D
 

Count Drew

General
12 Badges
Jan 14, 2003
1.980
159
Visit site
  • Darkest Hour
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife Pre-Order
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
This game has a lot of WarGame in it, not exclusively.

France Austria-Poland are a non-factor. Fully mobilized combined might their armies are 150k under LT26, they're less problems than French Peasants. Sweden has primarily Focused on Netherlands<YOUR 1 ALLY> and Russia too... Only the OE Spain and England have really dealt blows to France. The OE at a modest LandTech of 30 is a relative weaker foe for your Armies. Although he used the same technique of a crapload of Cavalry on plains payback I suppose for the way you killed him and Eugene a few Wars prior. Gotta give Dave Credit he caught you with your pants down entirely

You know if France wasn't greedy and offered The East a Huge Portion of War Reparation. They'd probably let you fight your Spanish and English Friends alone...but you haven't tried that avenue of politics :p nor will I doubt that you will

Oh and lets not forget you've got Hessen and Prussia fighting for you too. Probably a greater Threat than you are to Austria, right now