I would lolThis is how I hope they do it if/when it ever happens... all of a sudden one day that 75 ton sensor blip turns out to NOT be an Orion or a Black Knight and the player looses their %*^+^%# Mind...
I would lolThis is how I hope they do it if/when it ever happens... all of a sudden one day that 75 ton sensor blip turns out to NOT be an Orion or a Black Knight and the player looses their %*^+^%# Mind...
This is how I hope they do it if/when it ever happens... all of a sudden one day that 75 ton sensor blip turns out to NOT be an Orion or a Black Knight and the player looses their %*^+^%# Mind...
Why didn't HG submit the Letters Rogatory, to the Japanese Courts, before launching the suit? Not sure if they're just lazy, gaming the system, or both. Again, I say the judge should have thrown out the case once that fact became known.
I get the impression that every legal system has its own peculiarities that only make sense to lawyers.US Aussies get quite confused about the US legal system. Our own is bad enough
I get the impression that every legal system has its own peculiarities that only make sense to lawyers.
Probably legal maneuvering to drag the case out, especially if they knew they had no ground to stand on with the suit they brought forward, which the Letters Rogatory could have revealed.
I get the impression that every legal system has its own peculiarities that only make sense to lawyers.
I agree with the OP about the unseen, they ...
I completely disagree, and I think there might be some misunderstanding of the timeline of how things were added.
At the time the Marauder was shown in the Pre-Pre-Pre-Alpha of BattleTech, there was no active lawsuit and PGI had already made and implemented those designs in MWO. Most likely HBS was confident in including the Marauder because PGI had their redesigns implemented for a while in MWO, and hadn't been sued by HG.
If I had to hypothesize...When the lawsuit was filed, it was before BattleTech was released to the public, so to play it safe, HBS removed them from the roster. Why still put them in and risk the beta be taken down or the release of the game getting pulled by a court order. A company just wouldn't put content that was being disputed after a lawsuit over that content was being contested. It risks the title.
PGI had already added it into the title by that point, so they left it in (most likely because there was no court order filed demanding they remove them). Notice during this lawsuit that PGI still did not add any new reseens. Again, PGI also wasn't going to add contested content to their product while the suit was ongoing.
.[Mod edit] When the redesigned mechs were announced and then put in the a pre-alpha, there was no lawsuit (even after PGI had it in MWO for some time). I could easily see feeling confident in adding those redesigns at that point. It was only after that demo that the lawsuit was filed. At that point, don't risk your product, the livelihood of your employees, and the desire of your fans over a few mechs.
I know the timeline, but if anyone thinks that the company that cannot be named wasnt going to go after PGI in court then they were born yesterday because the evidence of the past several decades would indicate they will and did and have gone after every single company that has used the unseen.
I know the timeline, but if anyone thinks that the company that cannot be named wasnt going to go after PGI in court then they were born yesterday because the evidence of the past several decades would indicate they will and did and have gone after every single company that has used the unseen.
Because HG hadn't gone after PGI up to that point, and PGI had come up with their own interpretation for those affected unseens with Alex Inglesias own design queues and style. Imagery (resemblance) is the key, not the names themselves or the fact they are a mech. I think they thought there was enough alterations visually to differentiate the unseens from their reseens, and they were confident in that decision.
PGI thought the imagery was different enough to not warrant concern and there was nothing hinting at a concern for quite a while after designs were implemented. It just took HG a while to get their gears moving I suppose.
I realize that, but when has the company that cant be named ever, even once, been reasonable in the past?
Can't live your life or conduct your business under fear of what someone else MIGHT do.
On purpose.I get the impression that every legal system has its own peculiarities that only make sense to lawyers.
My whole point isnt that it "might" happen, my point is that it was guaranteed to happen. They never once missed an opportunity to sue in the past, so why would this time be any different?
The definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
IMO that exactly what happened here, insanity, they tried the same thing over again, and expected different results, even when all evidence pointed to the same thing happening. And guess what, the same thing happened.
