a good summary of the final developments of the case
I Disagree, there have been some good summaries in this thread, and I can only think it may be that the You-Tuber being sick from "Con-Crud" and excited about something happening in the case has metaphorically speaking "Shot his wad" as demonstrated by his "We Won! We won Moth** ***hers!" at the end of his Video. Kinda reminds me of the OJ Simpson Verdict, I remember people celebrating in the streets yelling "We Won!!" which was nicely put into perspective later by a Comedian who noted, We didn't win shit, you get a Car? I didn't either..
I see the same Hype happening now. The facts as I understand them, and as have been pointed out here in this thread are much simpler, in my onion (and I'n NOT a lawyer)
- There was a lawsuit claiming IP / Copyright infringement / violation
- Both sides filed motions, PGI wanted it tossed, HG wanted the court to wait for additional information from Japan proving their case (allegedly)
- Prior to the Judge ruling on the Motions, the Lawyers got together and were able to reach a tentative agreement, they them asked the Judge to slow his roll, that they may have a solution and withdrew their motions without prejudice (that way they could "Get it on again" if negotiations didn't work out.
- The two firms HG and PGI were able to come to a mutual agreement (that's code for a settlement, or pay-off, or whatever other term you want to accept) because it was privatly settled, they can set terms to this agreement including, making it private as opposed to public.
- There are terms to the agreement, we may not know them, we may never know them. We have to trust that PGI would not cut it's own throat regarding their product line, which allows for SPECULATION. like The unseen will be seen. That is Speculation based on the fact that an agreement was reached.
- We did not win shit. (only the Lawyers won)
We live in a time of instant gratification, and as frustrating as it may be we are gonna have to wait for additional details to be released, if they are ever released. in the meantime we can note the behavior of these companies determine potential impacts of their agreement.
The fact they dropped the suit against CGL, a defendant that had failed to defend and thereby defaulted is big.
For all intentive purposes, that was money in the bank. Yet they gave it up. we can speculate as to why, but ultimately it's because they HAD to. Something in the agreement with PGI mandated that. What that something is we can only guess at. I have a couple guesses but only the two parties and (speculation) possibly potential partners in related planned future endeavors may be aware of the details, and they could be bound to privacy clauses.
We'll see