also, in the 1820 screenshot there is a unified HRE, revolutionary Kiev which looks like Ukraine, Brittany in Normandy, monster Bohemia, Golden Horde and some weird green province in Spain (Portugal?)...so just a normal eu4 playthrough really
Most historical result with very few tweaks to 1.8, check it out!
- Thread starter lucaluca
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
also, in the 1820 screenshot there is a unified HRE, revolutionary Kiev which looks like Ukraine, Brittany in Normandy, monster Bohemia, Golden Horde and some weird green province in Spain (Portugal?)...so just a normal eu4 playthrough really
Yeah it is pretty good on second thought!
like the revolutions but I am not sure if colonies tend to break now as I am not finished with my first AoW game. but, as most people could probably claim lol, I think I've had better!
1. Persia forming from HRE is not historical.
2. Russia conquering Kazakh isn't historical, nor that distance into Ming.
3. United HRE is somewhat preposterous compared to history.
4. Golden Horde was one of the first hordes to die historically from the starting bookmark, interesting that they lived here.
5. Powerful Hindustan isn't quite right either.
Of course, from a plausibility standpoint, only the HRE and Russian presence in the East raise questions.
2. Russia conquering Kazakh isn't historical, nor that distance into Ming.
3. United HRE is somewhat preposterous compared to history.
4. Golden Horde was one of the first hordes to die historically from the starting bookmark, interesting that they lived here.
5. Powerful Hindustan isn't quite right either
.Of course, from a plausibility standpoint, only the HRE and Russian presence in the East raise questions.
1. Persia forming from HRE is not historical.
2. Russia conquering Kazakh isn't historical, nor that distance into Ming.
3. United HRE is somewhat preposterous compared to history.
4. Golden Horde was one of the first hordes to die historically from the starting bookmark, interesting that they lived here.
5. Powerful Hindustan isn't quite right either
Of course, from a plausibility standpoint, only the HRE and Russian presence in the East raise questions.
Yes, but they aren't any WORSE from his changes - really, he just has a normal EU IV playthorough, with all the wierd-ness that can happen, except that Manchu/Qing and the reformation played out a little better, as that's all he changed.
I'd like to see multiple games, to get a sense of what really changed from vanilla Art of War. Of course, getting a mod so we can install and try it would help greatly!
Ok will upload.
I can't get it to work
Will try Steam Workshop
I think you have to pack it into a .zip first, Right click on it and you should be able to if you have an appropriate program. Google 7-zip if you don't have one.
If that's your idea of a historical result then EUIV has really lowered yours (and everyone's) standards.
in 1626 The Netherlands exist as they usually do due to the event that spawn them, but have they fulfilled anything like their historical role in creating a trade empire? Even in 1821 I see almost no European presence in Asia. Meanwhile Lithuania's nothing like its historical size, having somehow annexed half the Steppes. Russia, in turn, skipped Astrakhan and Orenburg as they often do, and ignored the ever-present desire of the Tsars to unite all the Russias. France, Spain, and GB not being anything like their historical sizes, Spain having hardly any colonial empire in the Americas at all - which is what should be taking up that space instead of the Aztecs and Incas if the results were historical. England already annexed Scotland (presumably by force), and France, though the closest to reality, seemingly decided to leave Brittany+Normandy un-touched for centuries. Ottomans control hardly half of Egypt, and haven't even taken Belgrade from Serbia.Still better than EUIII.