More stable trade agreements

[unmerged(46221)]

Second only to the IC sliders, the trade agreement sliders are also very time-consuming. But only because some trade partners are turncoats! I often have to negociate more less the same agreement 20 times or more :wacko:

Two bad ones are Holland and GB, when you are trading for rares. Sometimes, they will cancel the agreement every 24h at midnight

Perhaps they obtain the shipping from their colonies just after they try to send yours, and have a shortage because of this order. If it's that simple, it would be easy to correct. Else, one should maybe put a minimal time for which the AI has to keep its engagement.

 

[Wyrm]

Yeah, a minimum binding-time for trade agreements would be nice.
Cutting off the deal early would cost relations.

 

[markpalm1]

Yeah, a minimum binding-time for trade agreements would be nice.
Cutting off the deal early would cost relations.

You should get paid the cash they lose (don't they lose something?)

 

[Mik1984]

Trade agreements should have a deadline, afterwards they could be broken off without concequences, however they could allways be prolonged after the deadline, if both sides wish to.

 

[unmerged(43564)]

'


Yes i totaly agree in more stabile trade agreements