there is nothing wrong with the overal volume of trade.
what is a problem is how it always ends up at a select amount of nations. right now, you can pull a lot of trade just by dominating your home node. you should not be pulling half a node towards your capital without any effort. provinces are also worth very little compared to trade center's and mechants, to the point wehre i think you could easly triple provincial trade power(and slightly buffing estuaries and center's of trade), or at least severly reduce trade power if you do not own any land there. while coastal and trading nations shoudl have significant advantages over landlocked nations, the way and ease they empty entire nodes is just insane.
overall, i like how basicly everyone got a nice income boost. while it might have pushed income into the high part(you can reliably get 3 +3 advisors really fast if you happen to sit on a particulary rivh node like bengal or venice), i really liek how it made nations far more able to bounce back from disaster. it used to be that smaller AI nations wer eplain doomed because they could barely afford an army(them building over forcelimits really helps slightly weaker nations voercome odds), and that when you stomped someone one or two times that as logn as you kept somewhat chaining wars they were never able to recover. well, not anymore. and even with this income boost i see major nations like castille and france going deep into debt due to wars.
