Based on player's cultural group, make new province names in the same way as human names when conquer a new province, will it enhance the historic immersion and experience?
More customizable dynamic province names?
- Thread starter UVOYCOX
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
But dynamic province naming is already a thing, you can even mod your own.
- 3
In the case of lviv and lemberg, which do you anglicise? Does it become lemborough?
- 3
OP's saying that names should be consistent with the culture you're playing as. CK2 had that. dunno where you get 'anglicise' from.
Because GB world conquest is my first game often on a new patch
You can have francify or turkify too, as OP is demanding dynamic naming for every province
yes. every language in the game. a big grid. you say that like there's something wrong with that.
Because the energies on making such a programme to automate the name changes would be better used elsewhere
Especially when we already have issues with dynamic naming like that russian thread in the bug reports about port Arthur now being landlocked
CK2 had it and no-one complained. it was educational. i don't think it's worth it for EUIV (nothing is IMHO) but it's cool to have.
Ck2 had every single province vary? Or the coat of arms varying depending on religion is what you're referring to? I know kiev became konnugadr or something under norse rule
like kiev. the names on the map would vary according to your culture. of course, some were common across cultures which made it a bit easier
So what are we arguing about? I'm just saying we should have about current levels of dynamic naming, not that each culture needs its own name for every province in the world
you and i aren't arguing. i'm explaining what OP is talking about and that CKII had it.