• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(18064)

Supreme Ruler of Earth
Jul 6, 2003
404
0
Visit site
The only Olympic events we need are "America has won # of gold metals" and that many for that country if any.

But I'm going to soon script an event for the Koreans, they are beign represented as one country in the Olympics.
 

unmerged(31085)

Imperator Caesar Augustus
Jun 25, 2004
486
0
profile.myspace.com
IM Sorry to say that they competed against each other

masternick201 said:
The only Olympic events we need are "America has won # of gold metals" and that many for that country if any.

But I'm going to soon script an event for the Koreans, they are beign represented as one country in the Olympics.

i guess you're wrong...they only marched in the opening ceremonies as one KOREA but still the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is still competing against its nemesis, the Republic of Korea...so it is still north vs south
 

unmerged(31085)

Imperator Caesar Augustus
Jun 25, 2004
486
0
profile.myspace.com
Other Events

NASA has sent a probe to explore the martian surface....

China has sent its first astronauts in space...

American reaction
a-The Space race is on!
b-Dont compete with them
c-Collaborate for a Mars mission

Random events or semi-random

European Union sent its first astronauts to the moon
Voyager has returned
Alien contact?

NASA discovered a distant galaxy
 

Shadow Reaper

First Lieutenant
5 Badges
Sep 18, 2003
289
0
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
Hmm, a bit off topic but a while back the BBC here in the UK had a program about the first alien contact made by humanity. I can't remember exactly how communication was established, but the aliens were infact a collection of machines created by an extinct race with intelligence that attempted to make contact with other races.

Though I think a Mars mission event would be quite good, seeing as its planned for 2009, and a 'Cold War' or even a 'Hot War' between the US and China could seriously push forward the Space Race.
 

unmerged(27050)

First Lieutenant
Mar 23, 2004
274
0
me got new event and stuff!

Country: USA
Title: Purchase CCV-L?
Trigger: Baghdad under U.S. control
Date: January 23rd, 2005

Since the first prototype appeared in 1985, the FNC Corporation, producers of the M113 and Bradley AFVs, has been toiling away on their latest project, the Close Combat Vehicle-Light. This advanced light tank, which only requires a 3-man crew, incorporates an automatic loading system for the main armament. Applique armor can be added on to the main aluminum plating outside for maxiumum protection. FNC has hinted that they will approach other countries if the U.S. doesn't buy.

A: Yes, we need newer equipment! (adds 1 armor division to force pool, -5000 supplies, -1000 oil)

B: Our tanks are just fine right as they are. (triggers 'FNC approaches England with new design' event)

Country: U.K.
Title: FNC approaches England with new design
Trigger: U.S. goes with choice B in Purchase CCV-L?

Since the first prototype appeared in 1985, the FNC Corporation, producers of the M113 and Bradley AFVs, has been toiling away on their latest project, the Close Combat Vehicle-Light. This advanced light tank, which only requires a 3-man crew, incorporates an automatic loading system for the main armament. Applique armor can be added on to the main aluminum plating outside for maxiumum protection. The Americans refused to buy this new tank, and so FNC approached the British military.

A: Yes, we need newer equipment! (adds 1 armor division to force pool, -5000 supplies, -1000 oil)

B: Our tanks are just fine right as they are. (nothing)
 

unmerged(25503)

Captain
Feb 7, 2004
323
0
Country:Germany
Title:Mobilization
Trigger:War with Russia

With the war with Russia thousands of reservists are being mobilized to fight Russia.

a:Mobilize(add 5 inf divs Lose 10,000 supplies +5 dissent add 200 mp)

b:We are fine(dissent -2)
 

unmerged(20873)

Official EBU Representative
Oct 17, 2003
399
0
Visit site
Is it just me, or does the mod really need more mobilization events?
 

Buke

Captain
88 Badges
Oct 26, 2002
431
16
Visit site
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For The Glory
  • Iron Cross
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Rome Gold
  • Sengoku
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Victoria 2
klas_knas said:
Is it just me, or does the mod really need more mobilization events?

Yes and eventually all major powers will get mobilization events.

poppy7143 said:
Country:Germany
Title:Mobilization
Trigger:War with Russia

With the war with Russia thousands of reservists are being mobilized to fight Russia.

a:Mobilize(add 5 inf divs Lose 10,000 supplies +5 dissent add 200 mp)

b:We are fine(dissent -2)

Hmm looks good but +5 dissent may be a bit too much dissent for reservists. Maybe +2 dissent is enough.

This event would be a good first mobilization event and a later mobilization event could look like this.


Code:
event = { 
	id = 
	random = no
	country = GER

	trigger = {  }
		}

	name = Conscription
	desc = With the war dragging on and loses mounting perhaps the time has come for mass conscription.
	style = 0

	date = { day =  month = year =  } 
	offset = 60
	deathdate = { day =  month = year =  } 

	action_a = {
			name = Call up this years class
			command = { type = manpowerpool value = 480 }
			command = { type = dissent value = 12 } 

      action_b = { 
			name = We are fine
		      command = { }
		}
}


event = { 
	id = 
	random = no
	country = GER

	trigger = { 
		war = { country = GER  country = SOV }
	}

	name = War with Russia.
	desc = With the war with Russia thousands of reservists are being mobilized to fight Russia.
	style = 0

	date = { day =  month = year =  } 
	offset = 60
	deathdate = { day =  month = year =  } 

	action_a = {
			name = Mobilize
			command = { type = manpowerpool value = 200 }
			command = { type = dissent value = 5 } 
                  command = { type = supplies value = -10000 }
		      command = { type = add_division which = infantry value = artillery }
                  command = { type = add_division which = infantry value = artillery }
		      command = { type = add_division which = infantry value = artillery }
                  command = { type = add_division which = mechanized value = artillery }
		      command = { type = add_division which = mechanized value = artillery }

      action_b = { 
			name = We are fine
		      command = { type = dissent value = -2 }
		}
}
 

Shadow Reaper

First Lieutenant
5 Badges
Sep 18, 2003
289
0
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
Long Live the ???

I was just pondering what might occur if Elizabeth II died whilst in the timeframe of the scenario. Although its more a flavour event, there might be one choice that has a big change on the UK. Remember, this has been debated in Britain several times, especially in the papers and on TV;

Code:
event = {
	id = ???
	random = no
	country = ENG

	trigger = {
		headofstate = ?Elizabeth II ID?
		ideology = liberal_conservative
	}

	name = "The Queen is dead, long live the ???"
	desc = "With the death of Queen Elizabeth after becoming one of 
Britains longest reigning monarchs, the British people began to wonder 
exactly who would become there next head of state. In accordance with 
Royal law, Charles would step up and take the throne, becoming Charles III 
(unpopularly associated with the English Civil Wars). However, many of the 
British population were not popular with Charles, especially after his 
relationship with Diana Princess of Wales. Some called for him to abdicate, 
and allow his son, William to take the throne, to become William V. But others 
still pushed for more. Under an old Parliament Act drawn up at the end of the 
Civil War, Parliament had the right to choose the Head of State. And thus 
many of the population who pushed for Britain to become a Republic, began 
to campaign for a new system where the monarchy would be removed.
	style = 0

	date = day = 1 month = june year = 2009
	offset = 120

	action_a = {
		name = "Long Live King Charles III!"
		command = { ??? }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Long Live King William IV!"
		command = { ??? }
	}
	action_c = {
		name = "Scrap the Monarchy, become a Republic!"
		command = { type = ideology which = centrist } # Is this possible?
		command = { type = alignment which = democratic value = 10 }
		command = { ??? }
	}
}

So how does that look? Its very likely Elizabeth would last a longer than this, but its an interesting scenario to ponder. I'm not entirely sure what the results might be, there would be cause for dissent for Charles and a Republic, though probably little with William as quite a lot of the people (and girls :rolleyes: ) like him.

Anyway, just an idea for you guys to ponder. I know your already past most of the beta work, but hey!
 
Last edited:

unmerged(24388)

King & Commander
Jan 7, 2004
1.329
0
www.tcw2.co.nr
i feel what should happen before this event is when the queen dies, the player should get the choice if charles marries camilla parker-bolws. there should be three options

A.chalres is forced to abdicate (as royal law states that he can not marry a devorced women).

B. let William becomes king.

C. ignore this outdated law charles shall be king and camilla his queen.


if option A&C are chosen then the other event should be sparked????

i fell that this would make it somewhat more realistic.

(price charles has also stated that if he became king then his name would be change to not assoiate with the english civial war)

people find charles unpopular NOT beacuse of his relationship with dianna! it is his current relationship (and past affair) with camilla parker bowls which the public find unpopular and disagree with.

(i know this as i have studied moderen british history resently)

BIOSIS
 

unmerged(29005)

Smiling Assassin
May 11, 2004
185
0
you don't need to study history or sociology to understand why people don't like Charles or Camilia... a 2 second viewing of a photograph of the pair will provide you all you need. -.-
 

Shadow Reaper

First Lieutenant
5 Badges
Sep 18, 2003
289
0
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
biosis123 said:
(price charles has also stated that if he became king then his name would be change to not assoiate with the english civial war)

people find charles unpopular NOT beacuse of his relationship with dianna! it is his current relationship (and past affair) with camilla parker bowls which the public find unpopular and disagree with.

1st part, yes. He was going to change his title to Rex, therefore being Rex I which is positively stupid. But I put Charles III in because its far too complicated trying to tell people about it in one event.

2nd part, again, requires a lot of information to explain the relationship between Diana, Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles. Probably too much to stick in one event. Plus most Americans are fond of Diana, and are not fond of Charles for this reason. Not that the event should be based on the views of America, but it would certainly make it a lot more confusing for them :p

Though possibly an event allowing Charles to marry could be included, seeing as it will more than likely be Parliament that makes the final decision. Of course, then you have to have a sub-branch of other events, one if Charles is married and abdicated, or if Charles marries and is allowed to become King. Then the player can decide over Charles, William (should be V in the event, not IV) or a Republic.
 

unmerged(24388)

King & Commander
Jan 7, 2004
1.329
0
www.tcw2.co.nr
so basically i think we can all agree that this event needs modfiying, and should have 3 options

1. Charles becomes king (but changes name not to Rex I think he was going to change it to James)

2. William becomes king
(but i dont feel that american ignorance should change the truth wouldn't this event mainly effect britian not the USA, and if an american plays as Britian then they should be prepared to see the truth)

3. Britian becomes a republic
(but if this (3.) happens wouldnt the commenwelth fall apart? what would happen to all those countires that the British monarch is head of state too??? eg Australia, New-Zealand, canada, jamica, grenada and so on?)

sure its a complicated event which needs explaining but it could be shortend eg .

Charles becomes king but changes his thrown name to James so not associate witht he English cival war [1642-1651]
Long Live The king!/God Save The King!

the other 2 can also be shortend

--------------------

oh and i wasn saying that your event wasnt good it could just be developed a bit :)

BIOSIS
 

Shadow Reaper

First Lieutenant
5 Badges
Sep 18, 2003
289
0
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
So the events would read like this;

Code:
event = {
	id = 1
	random = no
	country = ENG

	trigger = {
		headofstate = ?'Elizabeth II ID?
	}

	name = "Prince Charles and Lady Parker Bowles"
	desc = "With the Queens health ever more coming into doubt, the 
British people once more raised the question of the relationship between 
Prince Charles, heir to the throne, and Lady Parker Bowles. Many questioned 
the relationship, and under Royal Law, a King would be forced to abdicate if 
he married a woman who had already been divorced. As well as this, the 
public had been shown to be out of favour with Charles due to his handling of 
his relationship with Diana Princess of Wales. Many believed, after several 
Royal scandals, that Charles was having an affair with Camilla whilst married 
to Diana. The decision would have to be made of whether Charles was 
allowed to marry Camilla Parker Bowles, and still retain the chance of 
becoming King. If not, Charles would be forced to give the title of Prince of 
Wales down to his son, William, who would take over the throne once 
Elizabeth II died or abdicated.
	style = 0

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 2006 }
	offset = 60
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 2009 }

	action_a = {
		name = "Allow them to marry, but force Charles to abdicate in favour of William"
		command = { type = trigger which = 2 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Allow them to marry, and allow Charles to become King"
		command = { type = trigger which = 3 }
		command = { type = dissent value = 5 }
	}
	action_c = {
		name = "Stop Charles from marrying, and allow him to become King"
		command = { type = trigger which = 3 } #intentional
		command = { type = dissent value = 2 }
	}
}

event = {
	id = 2
	random = no
	country = ENG

# Triggered by event 1 ENG

	name = "The Queen is dead, Long live the ???"
	desc = "With Elizabeth II, one of Britains longest and most popular 
Monarchs dead, William V, son of the abdicated Prince Charles, prepares to 
take the throne. However, some amongst the population of Britain believe 
Parliament should choose to remove the power of the Monarchy, and instead 
implement a Republic constitution, allowing the public to vote in a Head Of 
State." # Can't be arsed to write too much right now :p
	style = 0

	date = { day = 1 month = june year = 2009 }
	offset = 120

	action_a = {
		name = "Long Live William V!"
		command = { type = headofstate which = ?Wills ID? }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Remove the Monarchy, create a Republic!"
		command = { type = ideology which = centrist }
	}
}

event = {
	id = 3
	random = no
	country = ENG

# Trigger by event 1 ENG

	name = "The Queen is dead, Long Live the ???"
	desc = "With Elizabeth II, one of Britains longest and most popular 
Monarchs dead, Prince Charles, now James, prepares to take the throne. 
However, some amongst the population of Britain believe Parliament should 
choose to remove the power of the Monarchy, and instead implement a 
Republic constitution, allowing the public to vote in a Head Of State."
	style = 0

	date = { day = 1 month = june year = 2009 }
	offset = 120

	action_a = {
		name = "Long Live James III!"
		command = { type = headofstate which = ?Charles ID? }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Remove the Monarchy, create a Republic!"
		command = { type = ideology which = centrist }
	}
}

The first event lets you choose basically whether Charles becomes King, or whether William takes over. Then event two is for William becoming King, or choosing a republic. Event three instead is between Charles and a republic.

Of course dissent and other factors caused by each choice would have to be fine-tuned, and probably more detail but i'm a bit tired of typing at the mo! :)

As for the other crown commonwealths, the Monarch could still reside over the other nations as Head Of State. However, its very likely that most would much rather have they're own elected Head of State (IIRC, the only reason Australia didn't vote to have an elected Head of State was because the one running for it was extremely unpopular)
 
Last edited:

unmerged(24388)

King & Commander
Jan 7, 2004
1.329
0
www.tcw2.co.nr
thats much better and more realstic lol.

but i dont feel that the people would like to have a republic.

i am not a royalist or a republican but if the country beacme a republic then there would be no need for britian, the monarch holds the whole thing together if the monarch was removed then what is there to stop scotland england wales and n.ireland becoming separte enteaties/countries?

+ does the govenrment have the power to say that it would become a republic just beacuse charles has abdicated? there must be some anchient law written many centeries ago by a monarch to stop this or it would have already happened? (lets just stop the poliatics) i feel that if the player was to choose to become a republic then dissent should be added!!

BIOSIS
 

Shadow Reaper

First Lieutenant
5 Badges
Sep 18, 2003
289
0
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
After James II tried to assert Catholicism as Englands main religion, Parliament passed a law deciding that it had the power to choose the Monarch based on religion, not just lineage.

Here's a quote from the Britannia website if your still not sure:

James' attempts to force Catholicism on England and regain prerogative doomed his reign. Parliament emerged supreme: royal lineage was still a major consideration, but Protestantism became the main factor in choosing a monarch - a decision now left to Parliament

As for people voting for a Republic, i'm not certain what the general feeling is, but in this game its left to the player ;)