Modding - Quick questions
- Thread starter -Rodri-
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Cheers it worked, any idea where to find a list of the numbers that correspond to each trait so I can modify my characters traits in the savegame
That depends on how many traits are installed and their load order.
They're listed in Documents\Paradox Interactive\Crusader Kings II\logs\setup.log like this:
[trait.cpp:853]: Trait #90 tag = brave name = Brave
They're listed in Documents\Paradox Interactive\Crusader Kings II\logs\setup.log like this:
[trait.cpp:853]: Trait #90 tag = brave name = Brave
How does gain effect and allow work for creating titles?
Doing it like that results in two k_Nitso being defined, one with "gain_effect", a barony as a de jure vassal.
Simply switching place of the last lines and putting them first, like this:
results in only one k_Nitso, with a de jure barony called "gain_effect".
All theese three kingdoms "cannot be created normally".
Whye does it behave like this and how can I solve it?
Code:
k_Nitso = {
allow = {
FROM = {
has_horde_culture = no
}
OR = {
k_Nitso = {
is_titular = no
}
AND = {
FROM = {
primary_title = { title = d_Nitso }
}
OR = {
FROM = {
num_of_duke_titles = 4
}
d_Nitso = {
de_jure_liege = k_no_kingdom
}
}
}
}
}
gain_effect = {
if = {
limit = {
k_Nitso = { is_titular = yes }
}
FROM = {
any_demesne_title = {
limit = {
tier = DUKE
de_jure_liege = k_no_kingdom
}
de_jure_liege = k_Nitso
}
}
}
}
color = { 0.75 0.13 0.30 }
color2 = { 0.65 0.99 0.70 }
creation_requires_capital = no
capital = 1
}Simply switching place of the last lines and putting them first, like this:
Code:
k_Nitso = {
color = { 0.75 0.13 0.30 }
color2 = { 0.65 0.99 0.70 }
creation_requires_capital = no
capital = 1
allow = {
FROM = {
has_horde_culture = no
}
OR = {
k_Nitso = {
is_titular = no
}
AND = {
FROM = {
primary_title = { title = d_Nitso }
}
OR = {
FROM = {
num_of_duke_titles = 4
}
d_Nitso = {
de_jure_liege = k_no_kingdom
}
}
}
}
}
gain_effect = {
if = {
limit = {
k_Nitso = { is_titular = yes }
}
FROM = {
any_demesne_title = {
limit = {
tier = DUKE
de_jure_liege = k_no_kingdom
}
de_jure_liege = k_Nitso
}
}
}
}
}All theese three kingdoms "cannot be created normally".
Whye does it behave like this and how can I solve it?
I seem to have a weird problem in my personal mod, whereby Scottish, Welsh and Irish nobles have voting rights for k_england's crown laws. I thought it might be because of e_britannia but
a. The problem doesn't exist in other de jure empires (IE Norwegian nobles don't get to vote on Swedish matters)
b. The problem doesn't exist in Scotland (only rulers of de jure k_scotland lands get to vote in Scotland)
c. Modding out e_britannia actually makes it worse (Gives votes to a bunch of random guys around Europe such as SD of Venice and Coptic Pope, as well as Scottish, Welsh and Irish)
So I'm stumped. Anyone know what's likely to be the problem and how I can fix it?
a. The problem doesn't exist in other de jure empires (IE Norwegian nobles don't get to vote on Swedish matters)
b. The problem doesn't exist in Scotland (only rulers of de jure k_scotland lands get to vote in Scotland)
c. Modding out e_britannia actually makes it worse (Gives votes to a bunch of random guys around Europe such as SD of Venice and Coptic Pope, as well as Scottish, Welsh and Irish)
So I'm stumped. Anyone know what's likely to be the problem and how I can fix it?
.png){kind=avatar}
That's a wise place to begin without posting your code. I would also recommend getting Notepad++, which will let you see when parentheses don't match.
If you have an imperial title, all de jure vassals do get to vote, including dukes and kings from the kingdoms under that title. So having the vanilla e_britannia means that Scottish, Irish, and any other rulers in the British Isles would get a vote. I noticed this when I created the Kingdom of Burgundy as Duke of Savoy then had to deal with the French Duke of Burgundy trying to get himself elected.
What are the codes for adding guardian or regent in the character file, please?
And is it not possible to add_weak_claim? That command doesn't seem to do anything.
And is it not possible to add_weak_claim? That command doesn't seem to do anything.
Well I already had, but not well enough it seems. Checked again and noticed a bracket missing at the end of k_england, so all good now. Thanks for the pointer
Now... I may be being a bit ambitious here, given my very limited modding experience, but I want to implement a decision for kings to have a coronation decision/event chain (basically a 'spend some money to get a trait that slightly improves vassal's opinions' kind of deal). How would I go about this? (Never modded decisions or even events before)
And while I'm here, is it possible to mod how the AI acts towards factions? ATM it feels very much like everyone's just waiting to jump on every bandwagon, regardless how much they actually their liege, so wanted to see if it could be made more similar to plots in terms of how willing people are to join...
No, but I can give my uninformed opinion on any number of subjects.
Both of those can be done with the effect command:
effect = { add_weak_claim = k_england }
I think adding a guardian by ID will probably work as well, E.G., guardian = 1.
I'm trying to add a trait similar to Sayyid that is always passed on to children, but is also passed on from both father and mother in order to make tracking descent easier. I have a couple problems: How can I 1) stop the AI from spawning characters with the trait, 2) make it always transferred from parent to child?
I know I could use agnatic, but that would only work for the fathers, I want to track descent from mothers as well.
I know I could use agnatic, but that would only work for the fathers, I want to track descent from mothers as well.
Your modding insight and favorable general knowledge won't stand for much come the Final Judgment, VanHouten. Your card is surely marked.
Thanks. What about regent? Is there a way to set a regent?
The guardian seems to work, though it doesn't show the child as her ward. It looks like he is being tutored by her though.
give_minor_title = title_regent
Once again in an effect scope, though this time on the character becoming regent. Note that for someone to be regent they've got to either be a vassal or a courtier of the child/incapable person/pilgrim.
Oh and the command for setting a guardian is set_guardian = <target>, not guardian = <target>.
To prevent it from spawning on random characters you'll have to add customizer = no, I believe, but that will also prevent it from being usable in ruler designer.
potential = { always = no }
That'll prevent random characters from getting it.
The guardian codes seem to do the same thing. What is the difference?
122 = {
name="Harold" # Godwineson, king of England
dynasty=756
dna="medjejoencc"
properties="ae00e0"
martial=8
diplomacy=6
intrigue=5
stewardship=6
religion="catholic"
culture="saxon"
add_trait="arbitrary"
add_trait="proud"
add_trait="skilled_tactician"
father=120
mother=101534
1022.1.1={
birth="1022.1.1"
}
1048.1.1={
add_spouse=131 #Ealdgyth 'Swanneck'
}
1064.1.1={
remove_spouse = 131
}
1065.6.6={
add_spouse=123 #Ealdgyth of Mercia
}
1066.1.1={
effect = {add_weak_claim=k_england}
effect = {give_minor_title = title_regent}
}
1066.9.14 = {
raise_levies = {
location = 62 # Leicester
force_mult = 1.0
}
effect = {
spawn_unit = {
province = 62 # Leicester
owner = ROOT
leader = ROOT
match_character = ROOT
match_mult = 0.40
attrition = 1.0
}
spawn_unit = {
province = 62 # Leicester
owner = ROOT
leader = 130 # Leofwine
match_character = ROOT
match_mult = 0.30
attrition = 1.0
}
spawn_unit = {
province = 62 # Leicester
owner = ROOT
leader = 132 # Gyrth
match_character = ROOT
match_mult = 0.30
attrition = 1.0
}
}
}
1066.10.14={
raise_levies = {
dismiss = yes
location = 62 # Leicester
force_mult = 1.0
}
death = {
death_reason = death_battle
killer = 140
}
}
}
Does this look right?
It doesn't set him up as regent though? The queen is set as regent instead.