ck3.paradoxwikis.com
Anyasia you are magnificent. I am glad I wasn't going totally mad.
I have the event firing at last, so I am 90% there. Unfortunately I have hit a snag which may mess things up. The events do not seem to be able to use the scope side_commander at all. I am wondering if this scope is only active during combat and this on_action fires when combat ends. Such a nuisance as the battle_on_action scope of friendly_commander was just what was needed.
Looked further and I think I am wrong again as the vanilla event combat_event.0001 fires from that on-action and utilises that very scope. I shall look further.
TOMSmisc.0102 = {
scope = combat_side
hidden = yes
immediate = {
side_commander = { save_scope_as = my_commander }
side_primary_participant = {
trigger_event = TOMSmisc.0103
}
}
}
TOMSmisc.0103 = {
type = character_event
hidden = yes
trigger = {
is_ai = no
NOT = { this = scope:my_commander }
# …
}
# …
}side_commander and side_primary_participant because they're not scopes saved from the on action, but merely traversal nodes within the combat_side scope. So side_primary_participant doesn't know what side_commander is because the latter is only known to combat_side? That's my guess, anyway, but it's just that at this point. It's incredibly inconvenient.
add = {
value = 0
opinion_modifier = {
target = scope:acs_sort_root
who = this
multiplier = 1
}
}add = opinion = { target = scope:acs_sort_root }
germanic_religion = {
faiths += {
norse_pagan_alt = {
color = { 0.7 0 0.5 }
icon = germanic
reformed_icon = germanic_reformed
holy_site = uppsala
holy_site = lejre
holy_site = paderborn
holy_site = zeeland
holy_site = ranaheim
doctrine = unreformed_faith_doctrine
doctrine = tenet_warmonger
doctrine = tenet_carnal_exaltation
doctrine = tenet_ancestor_worship
}
#norse_reformed = {
# color = { 0.7 0 0.2 }
# icon = germanic
#}
}
}
x.0001 = {
type = character_event
title = x.001.t
desc = x.001.desc
theme = learning
left_portrait = {
character = ROOT
animation = shock
}
option = {
name = x.001.a
trigger_event = {
id = gq_a0.002
}
}
option = {
name = x.001.b
trigger_event = {
id = x.003
}
}
}
x.0002 = {
type = character_event
title = x.001.t
desc = x.001.desc
theme = learning
left_portrait = {
character = ROOT
animation = shock
}
option = {
name = x.001.a
}
}
x.0003 = {
type = character_event
title = x.001.t
desc = x.002.desc
theme = learning
left_portrait = {
character = ROOT
animation = shock
}
option = {
name = x.001.a
}
}+= operator in script.
Your localisation references are a bit of a mess. Event 2 has event 1's title, description and option. Event 3 has event 1's title and event 2's description.
common/on_action/yearly_on_actions.txt and using one of those to call it (random_yearly_playable_pulse, perhaps).
bureaucratic_gov_events.03 = {
hidden = yes
trigger = {
OR = {
liege_or_court_owner = { primary_title = { has_title_law_flag = elective_bureaucratic_appointment_flag } }
any_vassal = { primary_title = { has_title_law_flag = elective_bureaucratic_appointment_flag } }
}
}
immediate = {
any_vassal = { primary_title = { if = { limit = { has_title_law_flag = elective_bureaucratic_appointment_flag } add_unpressed_claim = this } } }
liege_or_court_owner = { primary_title = { if = { limit = { has_title_law_flag = elective_bureaucratic_appointment_flag } add_unpressed_claim = this } } }
}
}
else_if = {
limit = {
# Check that the liege of the activity owner is present
any_participant = {
is_liege_or_above = scope:activity.activity_owner
}
}
# If liege is present, throw this event.
activity_owner = {
trigger_event = {
on_action = judicial_circuit_liege_random_pulse
days = { 15 30 }
}
}
}any_vassal (a trigger) rather than every_vassal (an effect block) in the immediate block. Using liege_or_court_owner (a scope transition) there might also be erroneous, but I'm not sure precisely who or what you're trying to target with it, so I can't be sure.add_unpressed_claim = this from within the primary_title scope—something you obviously realize, since you're using the this keyword to tell it which title to add a claim for—but by doing so, you're saying 'give the title a claim on itself,' rather than its holder. Furthermore, you're scoping to the vassal's own primary title—one he already holds—rather than to the title of his liege, which is, I assume, the intention.immediate block.
So much wasted time for such a little thing
... now it seems to be working perfectly.
