Is there a special requirement to create the Grand Duchy of Lithuania besides the normal? I meet all the requirements (52% of de jure territory, Lithuanian culture, enough gold and piety), yet the button is still grayed out. When hovering over it, it does not show any additional conditions that would be required.
[MOD] The Prince and the Thane - 1.092 Only
- Thread starter unmerged(208745)
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
I had to acquire around 60% to form it, apparently the displayed percentage required is bugged.
2.0.6 is fine for me. No crashes 100 years into the game as Sicily.
And on my side, I would like to ask more for a nerfing of the HRE
Byzantium is constantly dominated by civil wars, claimants and so forth, making it easy for some ambitious neighboors to claim land step by step. HRE on the other hand just stays there... no major revolts, no claimant wars, just a huge empire with a massive army ready to roflstomp anyone in their way.
And on my side, I would like to ask more for a nerfing of the HRE
Byzantium is constantly dominated by civil wars, claimants and so forth, making it easy for some ambitious neighboors to claim land step by step. HRE on the other hand just stays there... no major revolts, no claimant wars, just a huge empire with a massive army ready to roflstomp anyone in their way.
2.0.6 is fine for me. No crashes 100 years into the game as Sicily.
And on my side, I would like to ask more for a nerfing of the HRE
I totally agree with you, though one emperor who was terrible came to power in my game (also he was frankish), immediately he bacame emperor a succesion of huge civil wars broke out, where an alliance of basically all small counts and dukes in the empire won against the emperor.
But still overall the empire should be nerfed (or just large realms in general?), because having a 100k army compared to the 60k a unified England-France can field is too much, for an empire that historically was weak and extremely decentralised.
There is an historically accurate way of going around a solution to this.
Inter-dynastic conflict never involved many men, and maybe probably involved 1/10 of the conflicts of expansion of Latin christian Europe.
Interdynastic war (fx trial by battle) was in effect just an escalated means of negotiation on a spectrum of conflict, when contractual settlements between noble families, mandated by king/emperor/church, over land or peasants/ townships weren't able to be accepted by one party or the other. As such, it was a localized/ regionalized conflict at only one level of society, between the members of one class within this class' hierarchy.
Conflicts of Latin christian expansion not so. There, a dichotomous relationship with the opponent was created, related to the very european and roman concept of "the other". The opponent was not a peer protected by certain rights, but rather an empty legal space, into which peoples from ALL levels of society were free to take up arms and plowsheds and colonize frontier areas, be they slavic pagan regions, Ireland or the Levant. Needless to say, the movement of peoples and armies were much much larger.
Crusader kings 2 does a good job at mirroring this dynamic, to a certain degree. But in the case of HRE, a European country fielding 100.000 man armies was only something that happened after the levée-en-masse in 1792 of the french revolution!!
What if we toyed with a dynamic where attacking someone of the same religion would halve or more the amount of raised vassal levies? In any case, it has to be adressed, for the sake of balance as well as historical accuracy.
Inter-dynastic conflict never involved many men, and maybe probably involved 1/10 of the conflicts of expansion of Latin christian Europe.
Interdynastic war (fx trial by battle) was in effect just an escalated means of negotiation on a spectrum of conflict, when contractual settlements between noble families, mandated by king/emperor/church, over land or peasants/ townships weren't able to be accepted by one party or the other. As such, it was a localized/ regionalized conflict at only one level of society, between the members of one class within this class' hierarchy.
Conflicts of Latin christian expansion not so. There, a dichotomous relationship with the opponent was created, related to the very european and roman concept of "the other". The opponent was not a peer protected by certain rights, but rather an empty legal space, into which peoples from ALL levels of society were free to take up arms and plowsheds and colonize frontier areas, be they slavic pagan regions, Ireland or the Levant. Needless to say, the movement of peoples and armies were much much larger.
Crusader kings 2 does a good job at mirroring this dynamic, to a certain degree. But in the case of HRE, a European country fielding 100.000 man armies was only something that happened after the levée-en-masse in 1792 of the french revolution!!
What if we toyed with a dynamic where attacking someone of the same religion would halve or more the amount of raised vassal levies? In any case, it has to be adressed, for the sake of balance as well as historical accuracy.
"Always fallow XXXX army" button doesn't seem to work for me. Also got invited to Templar at age of 42 and always received same events in a row. Other than that , everything seems to be fine.
The Pope created the Order of the Holy Sepulchre. However they're based in the city of Tivoli which makes them a merchant republic. While it's pretty cool, is it a WAD?
Also a woman somehow became the Doge of Pisa:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=141217171
Also a woman somehow became the Doge of Pisa:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=141217171
Yeah have the exact same problem in my current game as Italy, though they no longer exist (damn catholic heretics, lollardism is the only true religion...)
The Templar order was independent in my game as the Kingdom of Jerusalem but I decided to give them the duchy of Jaffa-Ascallon because my counts in the area were arabs.
I gave the grand-master the duchy and for a few days it was called the Knights Templar but later it became the duchy of Jaffa-Ascallon and the grand-master was a duke!
I went to diplomacy and I saw that I could ask him to become my vassal. He accepted! Now I have four templar orders as vassals. Is this supposed to happen or a bug?
I gave the grand-master the duchy and for a few days it was called the Knights Templar but later it became the duchy of Jaffa-Ascallon and the grand-master was a duke!
I went to diplomacy and I saw that I could ask him to become my vassal. He accepted! Now I have four templar orders as vassals. Is this supposed to happen or a bug?
is there any list of titular titles anyplace? i'm playing a very fun game as the margrave of meissen but wanna figure out some next steps beyond the duchy of saxony
Since I'm too lazy to check the entire thread for any snippet of info.... Does this work with 1.92? My game is on steam so I can't go back to 1.91 with it.
What is this trait she has next to "Excommunicated"? Eunuch?
Unfortunately no! I'm using EGC's aging mod and the traits look similar to the eunuch trait.- Status