I've noticed that when your ruler is Andalusi, you have access to all retinues, and can build two different cultural buildings, namely the Al-Faris Training Ground and the Zanatan Riding Ground. Been noticing it since 2.85.
[MOD] SWMH 2.0 Map, de jure and general history mod. For a superior CK2 experience
- Thread starter Aasmul
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
That's due to SWMH not being updated for 2.0.2 yet. 2.0.2 changed how retinue triggers are handled, so retinues from before 2.0.2 are available to everyone.
Should be pretty much the only thing in SWMH that broke with 2.0.2 though.
Ah right. However it is the only culture as far as i can see that can build two different cultural buildings.
Regarding the retinues, do you mean the added 'potential = {...}'?
Well Andalusian Arabic shares one cultural building with the North African Culture Group (Zanata Cavalry) and one with a part (Egyptian Arabic, Levantine Arabic and Sicilian Arabic) of the Arabian Culture Group (Al Faris Cavalry). So which of the two would be more appropriate?
Last edited:
Yep. The old way to trigger retinues no longer works, so they end up being available for everyone.
I have a question Elvain. Weren't the Western Oases supposed to be independent from the rest of Egypt until the Ayyubids? Because in the 1066 and the Alexiad starts the Fatimids still control them.
Wow, your mod is as addicting as entire CKII. I was foolish enough to check it out and now I cant force myself to finish my lets play because my brain refuses to play without smwh.
That is most probably right.
The sources I have speak of Siwa being independent all the way to 13th century, which suggests that the other western oases south-east of al-Fayyum might be independent too and I wanted to do it that way. But then I red it propperly and there is explicitly mentioned Siwa, but not the other oases
Apart from that the main problem is that yet I haven't find who ruled there.
In the 1066 it might be some Hilalian tribes probably, but I'm not sure, as - in that very time - they just moved westwards to punnish the Zirids... and I'm not sure whether I should make Banu Hilal stretch all the way from Western Oases to inland Tripolitania.
Therefore I decided to give the oases to the emir of Alexandria in order to make him stronger and to give him common border with emir of Upper Egypt (al-Sa'id) with whom he was at war in 1060's and 1070's.
In Alexiad it is even more uncertain.
That said, I am open to change it, but I have nothing to fill into this region now.
Because in many of the provinces the most important settlements I was able to found for that time were churches, abbeys, monastic centers... The construction of castles and forts came after the norman invasion of the island in most of the cases. Many of those provinces have only one barony created, so the ruler of that barony gets the county title. Given that those baronies are mainly ecclesiastical, there you have the reason
Sorry for the necro but no, there were certainly forts before the Normans, and even some forts were termed castles. I would recommend having those sort of structures just with very low levels of fortification. I think the different holding types more refer to the type of dwelling, military, ecclesiastical or urban. There certainly were holdings in Ireland during this period whose primary function was military.
That said, a stronger emphasis should definitely be played on ecclesiastical buildings than elsewhere, given that urban settlement in Irish (as opposed to Norse) areas, was dominated by monastic towns.
One small question, are the two cultural buildings for the Andalusian Arabs, intentional or a bug? Since, see my previous post, they currently have two. Again, which one would be the most appropriate?
BTW fixed the retinue issue for my home version; a bit dull, but very easy to fix.
BTW fixed the retinue issue for my home version; a bit dull, but very easy to fix.
It's due to some changes made in the last patch as far as i'm aware. And the team did not update the current patch to account for it.
New Version uploaded(version 2.851)
Changelog:
- Updated for 2.02/2.03
- a handful redone coa in the HRE(mostly Saxony and Franken)
- a lonely new province in Saxony and a bit of related reorganization
- some bug fixes(which fingers crossed should include the notorious late bookmark selection ctd)
- Dutch dynamic names for Flanders, and a some Norsegaelic dynasties.
- fixed the dynasty avalanche bug
A special thanks to: Ruwaard for Dutch(and a Norman)dynamic names.
Download link
Brought to you by:
Axl Madness
Bertuccio
Elvain
Il Moro
Aasmul
Changelog:
- Updated for 2.02/2.03
- a handful redone coa in the HRE(mostly Saxony and Franken)
- a lonely new province in Saxony and a bit of related reorganization
- some bug fixes(which fingers crossed should include the notorious late bookmark selection ctd)
- Dutch dynamic names for Flanders, and a some Norsegaelic dynasties.
- fixed the dynasty avalanche bug
A special thanks to: Ruwaard for Dutch(and a Norman)dynamic names.
Download link
Brought to you by:
Axl Madness
Bertuccio
Elvain
Il Moro
Aasmul
Last edited:
Now PB+SWMH doesn`t work whith SWMH 2.851
PD Enable PB, PB+SWMH, and SWMH in the launcher (maybe works only with PB+SWMH and SWMH)?
PD Enable PB, PB+SWMH, and SWMH in the launcher (maybe works only with PB+SWMH and SWMH)?
Last edited:
That's weird it shouldn't really be affected that much by the update :unsure: You got all three ticked in the launcher right?
Sorry will get at it, looks like there is also quite a few suggestions in last couple of pages in the thread I missed :blush:. Been a bit busy time lately with exams and all, and we were primarily focused on the stuff for the next big version(took three days before I even noticed 2.02 had been released :ninja