Look at the instructions in the Clairvoyance Corner for the SVN build. Or read one of the many threads currently up of people asking the same questions.
[MOD] Lux Invicta
- Thread starter riknap
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
give_to_charity decision... where did it come from? It will give an opinion modifier to No Character if there isn't a rightful_religious_head. I could fix it if I could understand just what limits to give it.
Hmmm... Any religion with a head, obviously, but as to which religions those are, it needs revision and updating. Another SELIN-CHRONOS overlap department :laugh: IIRC, it wasn't based on criteria, but open entry influenced by certain SELIN attributes. Are we still doing the four types: independent, vassal, ruler, and autocephaly?
I thought it was just a catchall decision for those who didn't have another way to give to charity (because of the restrictions for Catholics, Sunnis and Shiites.)
It is. I was inquiring about the way we assign religion heads; to anyone who happens to know, actually.
I still adhere to this approach, if you find time to implement it.
If we're keeping the autocephaly mechanic, something needs to be addressed: some religions are still listed as Autocephalous even though they're unreformed. This is just because we had them selected for the Autocephaly before ToG came out, but they still need to be adapted. Either their reformed counterparts should be considered Autocephalous or they should be removed from the category, since unreformed religions cannot have heads.
Aside from that, I don't see any issues and can move forward with that.
I've been thinking about removing seduction from plots (which makes seduction a criminal offense) and instead have seduce liege/liege's consort/vassal ambitions. What do you guys think?
Indeed being able to imprison a young girl because she "ploted to seduce me" was funny but a bit weird... 
Only thing I would say is the only real difference between the two is ambitions are always visible while plots aren't. It might be obvious to the person being advanced upon, but to everyone else, perhaps not. There's also the fact that plots can be forcefully dismissed by the player, but there is no such option for ambition. It's an interesting idea, but I think the whole seduction scene belongs as a plot, since it's less about romance and more about political gain.
What we could do is make an ambition equivalent that is more about romance than political gain, so it wouldn't have the same payoff (or the same risks) that the plot does but still accomplishes the task of getting whoever the desired person is in your bedchambers. There would probably be some limitations on this, to maintain the distinction between acceptable advances and advances that might piss one or more people off. These limitations would probably be unmarried people that don't currently have a lover, and maybe even only limiting it to count-level characters and below (I would think there would always be suspicion whenever a lower-rank person and the rich ruler just "happen" to fall in love).
What we could do is make an ambition equivalent that is more about romance than political gain, so it wouldn't have the same payoff (or the same risks) that the plot does but still accomplishes the task of getting whoever the desired person is in your bedchambers. There would probably be some limitations on this, to maintain the distinction between acceptable advances and advances that might piss one or more people off. These limitations would probably be unmarried people that don't currently have a lover, and maybe even only limiting it to count-level characters and below (I would think there would always be suspicion whenever a lower-rank person and the rich ruler just "happen" to fall in love).
Ambitions can't be targeted as easily the way plots are, so either it has to be targeted at a liege, spouse or consort, or is little different from the find love ambition.
Spouses and consorts make sense - being commonly-desired individuals and all - but the first thing that comes to mind when one deliberately tries to seduce a ruler is "gold digger". As an ambition, it just feels too easy.
Ambition triggered events could handle gold-diggers (so they risk exile), and seduce liege ambition could be limited to the ambitious, greedy or lunatics. Also, we could eliminate the automatic bastard on success (which never made a lot of sense, and since lovers produce children now, it isn't needed.)
Can't find where you commented on spaces after closing quotes on exonyms in landed titles... you only need quotes if the name contains an embedded space. Examples:
Can't find where you commented on spaces after closing quotes on exonyms in landed titles... you only need quotes if the name contains an embedded space. Examples:
Code:
b_hereford = {
saxon = Hereford #no quotes needed
english = "Hereford on Wye" #quotes needed
}I posted a proposed new decision/event chain for Luwians in the Spirituality Enhancement thread, please look it over and comment.
Is there not a way to keep seduction as a plot without imprisonment being a possible outcome?
Really enjoying the mod.But I have a Idea.When you worship Alexander-Ammon you should can proclaim yourself the reincaration of Megas Alexandros (something like for the Zorostrians in vanilla).To do that you should have a titular Macedonian Empire and all de jure territories(and naturally worship Alexander-Ammon).When its already in the mod then sorry (sorry for the English, I can better speak German)
