The new patch is a hotfix of sorts for the date selection CTD and some other minor issues. I don't think much work will need to be done to ensure compatibility.
I suggest that you go Russian units/graphics + Muslim clothing = pure awesome
Now how can I do this? Just tell me which and where is the line of code or to copy paste a sprite or two, that are keeping me from getting 100% immersed![]()
is this mod compatible with the latest version?
What are you talking about?There's one thing picking me off though... some hints that Paradox is giving point to a possible map expansion/dlc to India. I hope this part of their secret project, unrelated to CK2 and not a DLC. If it is related... well, I'm going to get my head into the oven.
What are you talking about?
The mod is kind of in hiatus (at least from my side, I don't have access to decent computers right now), for these holidays. Riknap can't apparently run the mod and Megas Alexandros knows if FG has drowned in the sea of Indian province history. I will resume whatever work I was doing on the next year.
There's one thing picking me off though... some hints that Paradox is giving point to a possible map expansion/dlc to India. I hope this part of their secret project, unrelated to CK2 and not a DLC. If it is related... well, I'm going to get my head into the oven.
1. Tibet could fit non?The elephant bauble teaser.
I would argue that that is for EUIV or the Secret Project since:
1. Another teaser was in CK2's art style, and was winter themed. Elephants don't really mesh with that.
2. A map expansion is A Big Thing, which makes it unlikelier. Possible, but unlikely.
3. EUIV has a global map, so an Indian DLC would be easier. Especially since CoP will be off the table soon.
What a horrofying latin, my good sirCelebrātōte nunc Diēm Nātālis Sōlis Invictī!
If it's any help, my current step is redrafting the entire provincial structure in the definitions.csv so I can add more provinces![]()
You've said "My latin is that the best"Cuia Latina optima est?
Mea Latina illa Latina optima est!
You've said "My latin is that the best"And you should say "lingua latina", but that'd be nit-picking
I said "Whose Latin is best? My Latin is that best Latin" as "illa" is a classical demonstrative, equivalent to "that", rather than a definite article.You've said "My latin is that the best"And you should say "lingua latina", but that'd be nit-picking
I said "Whose Latin is best? My Latin is that best Latin" as "illa" is a classical demonstrative, equivalent to "that", rather than a definite article.
Also (auk), lētadiz miz sprekaną maþlō romaniskanō allaswē kunnī maþlijaną þanō auk hinō sprēkijō swa bad ik allaswa frēgī frijōndz mīnaz bataz sagdēhw
Liznō þiudiska :3Translation please![]()
It should have been "Mea lingua latina melior tua est" (my latin is better than yours) or " Mea latina optima est" the illa makes no sense and it is never used in such a context. At least, during my years as a linguistic, I've never seen it thereI said "Whose Latin is best? My Latin is that best Latin" as "illa" is a classical demonstrative, equivalent to "that", rather than a definite article.
Also (auk), lētadiz miz sprekaną maþlō romaniskanō allaswē kunnī maþlijaną þanō auk hinō sprēkijō swa bad ik allaswa frēgī frijōndz mīnaz bataz sagdēhw