A reload of a fresh game. Give me a second to upload it.Mr. Capiatlist: Was this from a fresh game, or savegame from a previous version? If the former, could you send me a savegame?
... Dunins were an OTL medieval Polish noble family of uncertain origin - most possibly Danish. Surname Dunin is by no means a Polish (or even a Slavic) one...
I don't see a Mithraic head of religion.
There is no overall Head of Mithraic religion by design decision. If you are curious, you can find an explanation of that topic and other related ones in the SELIN presentation post, regularly updated, linked in my signature.I have all the Pentarchs in place, but no Head of Mithraic.
I am curious: Are there more flavor events and decisions planned for the religions and states (I do know the SELIN is doing wonderful work in fleshing out the idea of the religion), and if there are some planned, I would like to offer a bit of help in the coding of those.[...] romano-britons sacrificing victims, especially captured leaders, to a sword of victory (like in the history stuff for this time line);things along those lines.
One more blood trait idea for prince Przybor of Kuyavia (ID 265)
I'd also opt for following dynastical renaming:
#10111 (Dunin) to Slezanin (Dunins were an OTL medieval Polish noble family of uncertain origin - most possibly Danish. Surname Dunin is by no means a Polish (or even a Slavic) one. My proposal's correct (but unaccepted for CK2, AFAIK) spelling is Ślężanin - and is derived from the local tribe's name that ultimately gave name to the whole region)
#101890 (Wizlawid) to Warcislawiec (Correct Polish spelling Warcisławiec - to reflect them being descendants of Warcisław. I've tried researching for this mysterious Wizlaw - and the only thing I've found was a corrupted German spelling of nam Wisław)
#1100135 (Siemowit) remained to Popielec (Self-explanatory, if the blood trait above passes)
And one last thing... Shouldn't west Slavic states be renamed? Dunno if there's any better name for Serbian state than Wendia (although I doubt Slavs would take up Latin name as their official one - I guess they'd stick to something like Serbja (Also, my Wikipedia query tends to show up that Sorbia is a corrupted German translation of the Slavic name). Polonia/Poland is closely related to the Polans - who don't neccessary have to be the state-building tribe in LI timeline. I guess adapting a name like Lechia would be more universal, tribal-wise. Dunno about Bohemia. AFAIK, the Latin name comes from the ancient Celtic Boii tribe than inhabited the nowadays Czech Republic's lands. So, latinised name Bohemia can either stay, or get replaced by some other Slavic name. Anyone Czech around to comment? ^^'
As of the dynasties - next package will feature mostly updated Germanic rulers - Varyags, Saxons, Suevs and Lombards (many thanks to Jimberry for preparing monarch lists up to 1066 for the last two states!)![]()
I'm a Dunin myself
And I think there should be several titular empires to represent such state of affairs. Without de jure kingdoms, but with special creation conditions (like having huge prestige, piety, good relations with the patriarch and the Kingdom of Bulgaria) and additional chains to put you in odds with the Byzantine Emperor.
But I'm OT, so here's my contra - I understand empires in CK2 as a result of a process that happened only twice in European history so far - with a single state not only amassing immense power and wealth, but also surviving its creator's death long enough to earn recognition. Such examples are, of course, Roman and Charlemagne's empires - which initially were either just yet another strong state around and by no means hegemonic (Hannibal anyone?), or considered usurpers until they have proven their right to exist (HRE case). Removing the empire of Russia from LI should result in removal of Etelkoz, Slavia and other never-exited-yet titles.
Pan is sooo Polish I'd feel bad about giving it to any other Slavic culture around ^^' "Zhupan" is also south Slavic, but at least in Polish, we have at least two almost identical words - żupan (a kind of noble formal piece of clothing) and żupa, an Old Polish word for a salt mine. Still, I think "pan" would be better (and less complicated, culture-wise) to use."
Well, I kinda feel bad when seeing the unused potential of cultural localisation ^^' When playing cultures that are completely foreign to me (like Nordic) I kinda feel much more immersed in the game whan I see foreign titles and stuff. I just feel that my "thane" is something a bit different that a regular count. So I'd opt for getting as many localisations as possible![]()
I'd also opt for following dynastical renaming:
#10111 (Dunin) to Slezanin (Dunins were an OTL medieval Polish noble family of uncertain origin - most possibly Danish. Surname Dunin is by no means a Polish (or even a Slavic) one. My proposal's correct (but unaccepted for CK2, AFAIK) spelling is Ślężanin - and is derived from the local tribe's name that ultimately gave name to the whole region)
#101890 (Wizlawid) to Warcislawiec (Correct Polish spelling Warcisławiec - to reflect them being descendants of Warcisław. I've tried researching for this mysterious Wizlaw - and the only thing I've found was a corrupted German spelling of nam Wisław)
#1100135 (Siemowit) remained to Popielec (Self-explanatory, if the blood trait above passes)
And one last thing... Shouldn't west Slavic states be renamed? Dunno if there's any better name for Serbian state than Wendia (although I doubt Slavs would take up Latin name as their official one - I guess they'd stick to something like Serbja (Also, my Wikipedia query tends to show up that Sorbia is a corrupted German translation of the Slavic name). Polonia/Poland is closely related to the Polans - who don't neccessary have to be the state-building tribe in LI timeline. I guess adapting a name like Lechia would be more universal, tribal-wise. Dunno about Bohemia. AFAIK, the Latin name comes from the ancient Celtic Boii tribe than inhabited the nowadays Czech Republic's lands. So, latinised name Bohemia can either stay, or get replaced by some other Slavic name. Anyone Czech around to comment?
Do you propose to use "Pan" for russians as well? I don't think they ever used it anywhere aside from in polish-dominated (or influenced) lands starting from 14th century.No maybe "Pan" as counts? It might be reasonable, and IIRC Czech and Slovakian also use it in their languages. Then Knyaz -> duke, Velikiy Knyaz -> king (while "king" should be available for some titles), and Tsar -> emperor.
I had this problem a while ago on an older version but it was with Kentish women. I haven't noticed it yet on the current version though.Well, I don't know what's causing your invisible girls of Wessex. Investigating it I found a mistake in interface/portrait_properties.txt (one instance of religion_group = german_group that should have been changed to norsegerman_group in hair type 9 (short uncouth)) but fixing that doesn't make the girls visible. I'll have to run an observe game overnight then see if there's any Fantastic Four wannabes running around.
Do you propose to use "Pan" for russians as well? I don't think they ever used it anywhere aside from in polish-dominated (or influenced) lands starting from 14th century.
Quite the mystery. I hope the solution will come soon. Enjoy the holiday, though.The problem seems to be related to out-of-range DNA values, and seems to only affect women for some reason. I don't know why it only seems to first show up in the granddaughters of the Hengistids of Kent and house of Wessex though. (I haven't seen any of their daughters being invisible, nor have I seen any invisible men.)
Tsar Monarchist said:But I think we should consider if Russians wouldn't be more influenced by Varangian, when it goes on titles.
While it might be understandable to recall Tsar as an empire-tier title, yet we should think about if it's actually good for Russian, who are less influenced by Greeks and more by Norse.
But Slavic nations are not like originally were. And even in OTL differences we so small, like was mentioned with Kievan prince example in some earlier post. So between Poles and Czechs were lesser - I was stating once in Polish historical forum that it wouldn't be odd if Poland and Bohemia united in 11th century established single culture.