Go into My Documents/Paradox Interactive/Crusader Kings II/Lux Invicta/gfx/ and delete the flags/ folder, that should take care of most if not all COA glitches.
[MOD] Lux Invicta
- Thread starter riknap
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
0.6d just broke my save. Ive been playing Lux mp with a few friends and everything has gone upside down (not literally).
A bunch of characters have the Mirza trait (who shouldn't have it.). A Dane lost its own hereditary blood trait which was replaced by blood of Zenobia, and characters who had genius lost them. Also I crashed three times.
A bunch of characters have the Mirza trait (who shouldn't have it.). A Dane lost its own hereditary blood trait which was replaced by blood of Zenobia, and characters who had genius lost them. Also I crashed three times.
I'm sorry to hear that, but unfortunately these thing happen when you add new features.
All portraits of Indogreeks and other far east countries have portraits that are black on my game. Is there a fix?
Sounds like either
1) you don't have the Mongol Face Pack, or
2) for some reason the game isn't recognizing that you own it (fix for this I found in Tech Support is to go into the Onlline Store before choosing Single Player, then choosing Single Player while still in the store.)
1) you don't have the Mongol Face Pack, or
2) for some reason the game isn't recognizing that you own it (fix for this I found in Tech Support is to go into the Onlline Store before choosing Single Player, then choosing Single Player while still in the store.)
Yep 1st one, and I cannot buy it because my stupid bank decided to cancel my debit card. Is there anyway I can change it so that it picks up Arab portraits rather than Mongol for the time being?
Tsar Monarchist said:
And I think there should be several titular empires to represent such state of affairs. Without de jure kingdoms, but with special creation conditions (like having huge prestige, piety, good relations with the patriarch and the Kingdom of Bulgaria) and additional chains to put you in odds with the Byzantine Emperor.
But I'm OT, so here's my contra - I understand empires in CK2 as a result of a process that happened only twice in European history so far - with a single state not only amassing immense power and wealth, but also surviving its creator's death long enough to earn recognition. Such examples are, of course, Roman and Charlemagne's empires - which initially were either just yet another strong state around and by no means hegemonic (Hannibal anyone?), or considered usurpers until they have proven their right to exist (HRE case). Removing the empire of Russia from LI should result in removal of Etelkoz, Slavia and other never-exited-yet titles.
Pan is sooo Polish I'd feel bad about giving it to any other Slavic culture around ^^' "Zhupan" is also south Slavic, but at least in Polish, we have at least two almost identical words - żupan (a kind of noble formal piece of clothing) and żupa, an Old Polish word for a salt mine. Still, I think "pan" would be better (and less complicated, culture-wise) to use.
Well, I kinda feel bad when seeing the unused potential of cultural localisation ^^' When playing cultures that are completely foreign to me (like Nordic) I kinda feel much more immersed in the game whan I see foreign titles and stuff. I just feel that my "thane" is something a bit different that a regular count. So I'd opt for getting as many localisations as possible
It would take either editing common/cultures/00_cultures.txt to assign vanilla graphical cultures to them (or at least graphical cultures that only use vanilla elements), or going through interface/portraits.gfx (a text file, despite the file type) and changing all instances of GFX_mongol to GFX_muslim. (Note that if you don't have the African Portraits Pack you may also see the same phenomenon in sub-Saharan Africa.)
I am curious: Are there more flavor events and decisions planned for the religions and states (I do know the SELIN is doing wonderful work in fleshing out the idea of the religion), and if there are some planned, I would like to offer a bit of help in the coding of those.
Personally, I imagine events where solar religions offer victims as a sacrifice after a successful holy war, invasion, or fending off one of those by forcing a surrendering of the attacker; conversion events in neighboring provinces based on the success of other religions; romano-britons sacrificing victims, especially captured leaders, to a sword of victory (like in the history stuff for this time line);things along those lines.
Personally, I imagine events where solar religions offer victims as a sacrifice after a successful holy war, invasion, or fending off one of those by forcing a surrendering of the attacker; conversion events in neighboring provinces based on the success of other religions; romano-britons sacrificing victims, especially captured leaders, to a sword of victory (like in the history stuff for this time line);things along those lines.
At present the Ard Ri succession mechanics for Celtic realms are going to be in the next update (can probably use more fleshing out), and the duel engine is planned (pending permission) for fringe cultures (Irish, Norse Gael, Scottish, Pictish, Sarmato-Brythons, Scandinavians, steppe and desert nomads.)
The Sarmato-Brythons of Brythonia under the Pendragons are more likely to do Sword of Victory sacrifices than the Romano-Brythons of Dumnonia, I think.
The Sarmato-Brythons of Brythonia under the Pendragons are more likely to do Sword of Victory sacrifices than the Romano-Brythons of Dumnonia, I think.
So what do you suggest I do? It wasn't made clear whether or not saves wouldn't be compatible, but apparently they aren't. We would have to start a new save now? Or wait for a fix?
I don't really understand what breaks saves (I don't think even Paradox does, hence their warning that save compatibility is never guaranteed between patches), so the best advice I can give is to back up to the last version that worked if you all still have the download, or start a new save.
I am sorry for this question but the 06 d i stable enough generally or I should wait for fixes and play previous version? Please answer me becuase I can not imagine my Ck2 without Lux Invicta o
o
Culture is Brython (House Artorius). Religion is Pelagian.
I am using both the Sword of Islam and the Legacy of Rome.
I am sorry for this question but the 06 d i stable enough generally or I should wait for fixes and play previous version? Please answer me becuase I can not imagine my Ck2 without Lux Invicta
I think it's as stable or stabler than previous versions I've released.
-That will help out a lot, thanks.
-That was the main reason I said the modifier was killer. I think I'll go into the file and change that myself, if I can find it.
-It might be best if you simply change heresy mechanics entirely, since they don't really suit this mod. So, heresy can't spread on its own anymore, and doesn't spring up randomly in provinces. Instead, maybe independent lords can sometimes choose to switch over to heresies? With higher chance the lower their rank, and they switch to whatever heresy is particular to their location?
EDIT: I did find it.
One more blood trait idea for prince Przybor of Kuyavia (ID 265)
I'd also opt for following dynastical renaming:
#10111 (Dunin) to Slezanin (Dunins were an OTL medieval Polish noble family of uncertain origin - most possibly Danish. Surname Dunin is by no means a Polish (or even a Slavic) one. My proposal's correct (but unaccepted for CK2, AFAIK) spelling is Ślężanin - and is derived from the local tribe's name that ultimately gave name to the whole region)
#101890 (Wizlawid) to Warcislawiec (Correct Polish spelling Warcisławiec - to reflect them being descendants of Warcisław. I've tried researching for this mysterious Wizlaw - and the only thing I've found was a corrupted German spelling of nam Wisław)
#1100135 (Siemowit) remained to Popielec (Self-explanatory, if the blood trait above passes)
And one last thing... Shouldn't west Slavic states be renamed? Dunno if there's any better name for Serbian state than Wendia (although I doubt Slavs would take up Latin name as their official one - I guess they'd stick to something like Serbja (Also, my Wikipedia query tends to show up that Sorbia is a corrupted German translation of the Slavic name). Polonia/Poland is closely related to the Polans - who don't neccessary have to be the state-building tribe in LI timeline. I guess adapting a name like Lechia would be more universal, tribal-wise. Dunno about Bohemia. AFAIK, the Latin name comes from the ancient Celtic Boii tribe than inhabited the nowadays Czech Republic's lands. So, latinised name Bohemia can either stay, or get replaced by some other Slavic name. Anyone Czech around to comment? ^^'
As of the dynasties - next package will feature mostly updated Germanic rulers - Varyags, Saxons, Suevs and Lombards (many thanks to Jimberry for preparing monarch lists up to 1066 for the last two states!)
I'd also opt for following dynastical renaming:
#10111 (Dunin) to Slezanin (Dunins were an OTL medieval Polish noble family of uncertain origin - most possibly Danish. Surname Dunin is by no means a Polish (or even a Slavic) one. My proposal's correct (but unaccepted for CK2, AFAIK) spelling is Ślężanin - and is derived from the local tribe's name that ultimately gave name to the whole region)
#101890 (Wizlawid) to Warcislawiec (Correct Polish spelling Warcisławiec - to reflect them being descendants of Warcisław. I've tried researching for this mysterious Wizlaw - and the only thing I've found was a corrupted German spelling of nam Wisław)
#1100135 (Siemowit) remained to Popielec (Self-explanatory, if the blood trait above passes)
And one last thing... Shouldn't west Slavic states be renamed? Dunno if there's any better name for Serbian state than Wendia (although I doubt Slavs would take up Latin name as their official one - I guess they'd stick to something like Serbja (Also, my Wikipedia query tends to show up that Sorbia is a corrupted German translation of the Slavic name). Polonia/Poland is closely related to the Polans - who don't neccessary have to be the state-building tribe in LI timeline. I guess adapting a name like Lechia would be more universal, tribal-wise. Dunno about Bohemia. AFAIK, the Latin name comes from the ancient Celtic Boii tribe than inhabited the nowadays Czech Republic's lands. So, latinised name Bohemia can either stay, or get replaced by some other Slavic name. Anyone Czech around to comment? ^^'
As of the dynasties - next package will feature mostly updated Germanic rulers - Varyags, Saxons, Suevs and Lombards (many thanks to Jimberry for preparing monarch lists up to 1066 for the last two states!)
Last edited:
Haven't personally seen this issue, so I apologize if it has been brought up before... but my neighbor has blank children and I fear that if I breed with him I too will have liters of invisible children:
