There is one thing i've noticed that I would like to see changed.
In the Clash of Kings scenario, I won as Robb Stark and forced Joffrey off of the throne. I executed him but spared his siblings. The problem is his siblings still have "strong" claims even though the quest chain includes proving them to be the incestuous offspring of Jaime and Cersei. If this has become common knowledge, why would they then get strong claims? Apart from pulling a Gregor Clegane, there's really no way to deal with this.
The argument could be made, "Oh, they get strong claims since Joffrey was on the throne, regardless of his legitimacy." Ok, assuming that is valid, what LP, in their right mind, is going to back someone produced by an incestuous relationship, on top of the fact that the family they belong to is in shambles. This assumes the Lannisters lose, which means that not only are their military forces largely destroyed and their top commanders dead, captured, or exiled but all the lesser lords of the Westerlands would probably be considering overthrowing the Lannisters in favor of themselves or someone close to them. My point is, it seems unrealistic to me that anyone would be willing to support Tommen or Myrcella for any reason.
I suggest this more for the stability of the Iron Throne itself, and not so I can survive better as King of the North. After I gave the throne to Stannis, it resulted in about 100 years of constant civil war in the south with the Iron Islands, Dorne, and the Vale winning their independence. On top of this, a combined Reach/Rock alliance(how amusing) are fighting a war of independence and it looks like they are going to win due to the massive military strength of the Reach. This means that I am largely unchallenged as King in the North which makes for a bit of a boring game.
Any thoughts on this?
