You still have Chickasaw and Choctaw backwards. The Chickasaw were based in northern Mississippi, along the shores of the river. Their lands did indeed at times extend into western Alabama, but it certainly wasn't the center of their influence. The Choctaw were the ones who were more influential in western Alabama. Please exchange Choctaw and Chickasaw provinces (and spell Chickasaw correctly too).
Hmm, not so sure on the North and South Kentucky thing. I much prefer Kentucky and Cumberland for those provinces, although the latter does have the disadvantage of not being a native name. How about "Appalachia" for South Kentucky maybe (and reverting North Kentucky back to just plain Kentucky)? Or is that putting that name in an historically incorrect location - does anyone know?
My knowledge of the tribes of Canada isn't quite as good as that of those in the US, but didn't the Ottawa also cover the area you have as "North Ontario" as well as eastern Michigan? Surely the capital of Canada got its name from the tribe living near that area. If so, wouldn't "Ottawa" be a better name for North Ontario?
And, in another area of the world entirely - please change "Licia" to "Lycia" in Anatolia! That first vowel is an upsilon and not an iota, and *everybody*, including the Romans, had it as a "y".
While most of Garbon's Central Asia provinces are fine, given the location of Lake Issyk-Kul on the map, his Kashgar province is much too far to the northwest. He pretty much agrees in one of his posts on the last page. Kashgar province should probably be renamed Issyk-Kul or Tien Shan. And can you please put the Syr Darya River on the map, along the northern border of Khwarazm, the northeastern and eastern borders of Kyzyl Kum, and the northeastern border of Samarkand?
