Miozozny said:
True. Only GM vanted revote for the purpose of evading such discussions. Iron wanned to recount votes.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
True. Only GM vanted revote for the purpose of evading such discussions. Iron wanned to recount votes.
By the way Fnuco could take over Poland unless he doesn´t like it or it isn´t more important than NL.
Ironfist said:
Its up to him. Jorian asked for Knights and he got them. However will that finish, it was his wish so I fullfilled it.
Last edited:
You start 16:00 CEST right? I'll come along if I have time to see if there is anything open. 
Van Engel said:You start 16:00 CEST right? I'll come along if I have time to see if there is anything open.
Yeah 16.00 CEST, Suday 8. April. Glad to have you on a sub bench again m8.
Ah 8th April? Brilliant, in that case I'll take the first land nation which someone drops.Nabukodonosor said:Yeah 16.00 CEST, Suday 8. April. Glad to have you on a sub bench again m8.
Van Engel said:Ah 8th April? Brilliant, in that case I'll take the first land nation which someone drops.
Welcome m8.
Last edited:
Phew. I´m impressed. This campaign hasn´t even started yet and startled men are jumping around confused already. Nice & neat.
My vote still goes to 1453. any of the diabolical 1492ers are free to reconsider and thus save their souls from eternal damnation...
My vote still goes to 1453. any of the diabolical 1492ers are free to reconsider and thus save their souls from eternal damnation...
Also I noticed there is no Poland, any chance of me being able to take that? I'd vote 1453 too.
I'd vote 1453 too. 
Why isnt there three dots after my name as it is after the names of those who voted for 1453 and 1492?
Absolut said:Why isnt there three dots after my name as it is after the names of those who voted for 1453 and 1492?
Guess why.
Van Engel said:Also I noticed there is no Poland, any chance of me being able to take that?
A Poland would be nice
Van Engel said:Also I noticed there is no Poland, any chance of me being able to take that?
Sure m8. However, Fnuco might want to play Poland if NL will be unaccessible. All I can do now is to shorten the time for Csutton to answer (seems he won't do that anyway) and assign NL to Fnuco and Poland to you. However, I need support of my coGMs for such move, so you'll have to wait for answer untill they come online and see this post.
I'd go with NL if csutton doesnt show up.
VE can have Poland, im not interested in it, i was in a naval/trading mood for this game.
edit: Engel please vote 1492.
I heard that the 53 scenario is seriously overpowering the OE.
VE can have Poland, im not interested in it, i was in a naval/trading mood for this game.
edit: Engel please vote 1492.
I heard that the 53 scenario is seriously overpowering the OE.
Fnuco said:I heard that the 53 scenario is seriously overpowering the OE.
Only my OE.
BTW, check FAL's OE in 492 scen and you won't say that.
So, 13 players and 13 votes...
1492: 5
1453: 7
1492: 1
I´ll let the GM claim the winner
1492: 5
1453: 7
1492: 1
I´ll let the GM claim the winner
Ironfist said:So, 13 players and 13 votes...
1492: 5
1453: 7
1492: 1
I´ll let the GM claim the winner
We will conclude voting in Thursday, when there will be no chance for another vote to come. However, voting is practically closed if someone doesn't change his mind.
Last edited:
Just wondering why? Surely for someone to 'waste' 100 ships sailing round asia in the 1500 deserves to do so?Nab said:
If this has already been covered though I'll be quiet.
- Status