well i dont actually know if one is indeed better than the other.
Militia up's:
_ can move (as opposed to garrisons, who have to strat deploy)
_ are cheaper/faster to produce
_ with MP they have the same suppression rate of partisans
_ they take less TC and less MP to make
_ when given artillery they become at least versatile
Militia down's:
_ they suck at combat
_ slow moving
Garrison up's:
_ a bit lower on stats when compared to infantry
_ will last longer in combat than Militia, even if unbrigaded.
Garrison down's:
_ same MP cost as Infantry; in other words, a lot
_ cant move!
_ higher TC consumption
If someone disagrees with me please let me know. in my opinion brigaded militias or even unbrigaded ones are better than garrisons for the reasons stated above.
Militia up's:
_ can move (as opposed to garrisons, who have to strat deploy)
_ are cheaper/faster to produce
_ with MP they have the same suppression rate of partisans
_ they take less TC and less MP to make
_ when given artillery they become at least versatile
Militia down's:
_ they suck at combat
_ slow moving
Garrison up's:
_ a bit lower on stats when compared to infantry
_ will last longer in combat than Militia, even if unbrigaded.
Garrison down's:
_ same MP cost as Infantry; in other words, a lot
_ cant move!
_ higher TC consumption
If someone disagrees with me please let me know. in my opinion brigaded militias or even unbrigaded ones are better than garrisons for the reasons stated above.