Merging Armies?

[Conanteacher]

Is it better to have 9 inf under one single general or let them fight as seperate divisions, lead by 1 gen, 2-3 Lt. Gen and 5-6 Mj. Gen?
I prefer the second selection as I can move div's independent and have many leaders gain exp. simultaneously.
I think it is much better to have many leaders with separate traits, even if I sometimes don't get e.g. the offensive doctrine applied to all my units!
Any suggestions?:wacko:

 

[unmerged(18208)]

It doesnt matter. What does matter is the leaders skill and traits. But the way you are doing is more effective becouse more leaders get skills and you can easier manuver your army.

 

[sbr]

AXis is right; the other benefit is that lower level leaders gain experience faster, so your Mj and Lt Generals will get better faster than 1 Gen.

 

[unmerged(48743)]

I split my armies to 1 unit armies and train the Mj.Gens, but this is a hell of micromanagement and do this only in the starting phases of the game/battle.