• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(8303)

Henri II Valois
Mar 19, 2002
2.046
0
www.europa-universalis.com
Would anyone else here be turned off to CK if it had major micro-management?

I bought Medieval: Total war and though it doesnt really capture the feeling of the time, I don't think it is supposed to.. :(

but the micro-management is awful. and I don't like how every province is almost the same. I hope CK has a strong concept of a capital or central province and if you can make some kind of upgrades in your cities it is easy like in EU2 or at least easy to track without having to build this building for a soldier, then its upgrade, then its upgrade, then the two prerequisites for its upgrade.

I just finished a session of M:TW and i have a headache.. ;)

For me, it makes playing any nation with a lot of provinces, like France or England impossible. I prefer tiny realms like Denmark or Poland.

I don't like to have to manage every minor aspect of my nation to the point it is more tedious than fun. Please don't! :(
 

unmerged(6160)

Member of Parliament 1900
Oct 24, 2001
916
0
Visit site
I think, that outside your small Royal Lands, and court, nobles, bishops, townspeople will control your other land, to a extant, and you can support certain groups. But if you so wish you can micromange. I won't
 

unmerged(5664)

Barrister & Solicitor
Sep 5, 2001
4.676
0
Visit site
I'd be surprised if there were many province improvements that can be made. Historically that isn't what occupied a lord's time. Rather you'll be more concerned with ruling people, managing your family and your vassals, that kind of thing.
 

unmerged(5822)

Moved on
Sep 20, 2001
7.672
0
Originally posted by BarristerBoy
I'd be surprised if there were many province improvements that can be made. Historically that isn't what occupied a lord's time. Rather you'll be more concerned with ruling people, managing your family and your vassals, that kind of thing.

I think about 10 improvements are available, but I'm not sure.
 
Mar 27, 2002
2.756
0
Visit site
It is really nice though that you can only build certain types of soldiers in certain provinces. Like Gallowglasses in Ireland, Highland clansmen in Scotland, Bedhouin camel warriors in north africa, and etc.

Not all provinces are the same. At least not as far as units are concerned. :)
 

Nikolai II

A bunny with a hat
130 Badges
Nov 18, 2001
9.389
415
www.giantitp.com
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Age of Wonders II
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron II: Beta
  • 200k Club
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • BATTLETECH - Backer
  • War of the Roses
  • Lead and Gold
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Magicka
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
For CK (despite however there are available) Sergei has mentioned hot-keys bringing graphix for them up one the map, so it will be easy to see which provinces has improvments and which hasn't. :)
 
Mar 27, 2002
2.756
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Damocles
I prefer Micromanagement. I enjoy micromanagement. I think it adds depth to the game :D. Many of the bad moves on the Developer's part in EUII either since patched or not, was many of the times as a result of them trying to simplify things.

I agree, I do like micromanaging a few provinces. But the problem is when you have to micromanage 100 provinces or so. :eek:
 

Idiotboy

Field Marshal
83 Badges
Nov 7, 2001
5.173
1
Visit site
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Warlock: Master of the Arcane
  • Warlock 2: The Exiled
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria 2
Originally posted by Captain Krunch


I agree, I do like micromanaging a few provinces. But the problem is when you have to micromanage 100 provinces or so. :eek:

When that happens things get very ugly, very quick. Perhaps some sort of govenorial system. One could give commands to vassals to buid a prov in a certain direction. Then they would react to that in different ways.
 
Mar 27, 2002
2.756
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Idiotboy


When that happens things get very ugly, very quick. Perhaps some sort of govenorial system. One could give commands to vassals to buid a prov in a certain direction. Then they would react to that in different ways.

That would be nice. Perhaps they would even declare their province(s) to be an independant nation, if their loyalty to you isn't very great.
 

unmerged(8303)

Henri II Valois
Mar 19, 2002
2.046
0
www.europa-universalis.com
I do like micromanagement too but only to a certain degree. not to the point that i have to remember to build x y and z in provinces f, o , and r in order to keep them all good n going. i dont mind being able to set tax rates etc in various provinces. its just when i have to be constantly adjusting things and building buildings or upgrading or checking on garrisons or checking for decaying walls, etc that I get a bit annoyed. ;)
 
Mar 27, 2002
2.756
0
Visit site
One thing I learned from playing the Byzantines, is you do not necessarily have to build every building in every province. To do so would quickly eat up all of your money... instead it is best to have a few provinces that you focus on for all the really special buildings. For example, Constantinople is already well established at the start, so use that as your recruitment center for advanced unit types... then ship those advanced units to your lesser developed provinces as garisons.

(Those Varangian guard units kick ass, by the way. ;) )
 
Mar 27, 2002
2.756
0
Visit site
Originally posted by jaron
well maybe not on that level!! castles III is also a bit annoying. Every turn pope demands gold.

I want to rule over only one city and let someone else be the overlord for awhile!

Sounds like you are looking for sim city. ;)
 

Damocles

Field Marshal
55 Badges
Mar 22, 2001
6.905
218
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Semper Fi
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2
If Crusader Kings is developed properly (With a good period of beta testing!) then it won't be possible 95 percent of the time to even have to worry about hundreds of provinces. Perhaps a dozen at most...If every two-bit dynasty ends up controlling half of Europe by game end, then something would have gone tragically wrong...