Are there any new features in connection with the above-mentioned topic? Or will there be a whole DD about it? 
Managing occupied territores (Question)
- Thread starter WarPie
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I assume it will be the same as HOI3, countries will be "striped" until they sue for peace, eg still fight on through exiled governments and resistance movements.Are there any new features in connection with the above-mentioned topic? Or will there be a whole DD about it?
Please don't speak unnecessarily in bold
Sorry, but I will.I assume it will be the same as HOI3, countries will be "striped" until they sue for peace, eg still fight on through exiled governments and resistance movements.
Please don't speak unnecessarily in bold
- 9
no. Territory that you conquer will be directly under your controll. You wont own the state untill you demand it in the peace deal tho.I assume it will be the same as HOI3, countries will be "striped" until they sue for peace, eg still fight on through exiled governments and resistance movements.
Please don't speak unnecessarily in bold
Sorry, but I will.
Why?
Anyone has any idea about the percentage of factories/mp you get from occupied territory?
That doesn't stop it from being superfluous.I assume this thread is not about my writing style.
50%, if I recall from HOI: DH
- 2
- 1
I think Exil Goverments are only a option for countrys, which are part of a faction. (Until this faction is defeated.)
you dont occupy land, you directly controll it. There is no striped occupied territory in HoI IV anymore.Is that not what I said??
We will have our answer very soon. Propably in next Dev video diary, when Germany play will conquer at least some territory.
Plot twist: full diplomatic offensive Germany and no war ever breaks out because of massive land concessions
That doesn't stop it from being superfluous.
50%, if I recall from HOI: DH
In Hoi 3 that depended on the policy you chose. You only got 50% of the ic and resources with the harshest occupation policy. As a con, you got almost no manpower and leadership and a high revolt risk with that particular policy
I think a single occupation policy would make no sense. It would take away the different options we had. That is usually not good
I personally hope that they differentiate between "owned" provinces and occupation. it wouldn't make sense for Germany to treat the factories and population of occupied Kiev the same as they would Konigsberg.
- 4
While this is true, sometimes the lines are blurred. For example, Germany considered Czechoslovakia "annexed and partitioned", whereas the western allies simply referred to it as "occupied".
That was just semantics on the part of the allies. all that matters is what the controller of the territory considers the status of the territory to be, legitimate or illegitimate as the acquisition may have been.
- 3
Looks like territory is directly controlled, when taken away (look at Italy and Greece)
- 1
maybe there are modifiers to these occupied areas we cannot see on the map. idunno.