Is it just me, or there is a serious inconsistency in the whole Tributary thing...
Here's the situation: I'm playing a little Icelandic lord and I attack the microscopic Faroe Islands ( a little independent domain) and make them tributary to me.
A bit later, the big player of the area, the Jarl of Viken, who owns two-thirds of Scandinavia, conquers the islands. For some reason, even though the Jarl is the new owner of the islands, the y are still tributary to me, as if the tributary status was inherent to the land;
The crazy thing is that now the jarl of Viken appears as a tributary to me in my list of allies ( because of that microscopic islands which must constitute about 2% of his domain) and I can call him to war whenever I want (that is, his several-thousand-strong armies...)
It's just plain silly. actually, it's a game stopper
The tributary status is a relation of subordination from one lord to the other. If that lord is replaced and his land conquered, why would the new owner end up with the tributary obligation???
Here's the situation: I'm playing a little Icelandic lord and I attack the microscopic Faroe Islands ( a little independent domain) and make them tributary to me.
A bit later, the big player of the area, the Jarl of Viken, who owns two-thirds of Scandinavia, conquers the islands. For some reason, even though the Jarl is the new owner of the islands, the y are still tributary to me, as if the tributary status was inherent to the land;
The crazy thing is that now the jarl of Viken appears as a tributary to me in my list of allies ( because of that microscopic islands which must constitute about 2% of his domain) and I can call him to war whenever I want (that is, his several-thousand-strong armies...)
It's just plain silly. actually, it's a game stopper
The tributary status is a relation of subordination from one lord to the other. If that lord is replaced and his land conquered, why would the new owner end up with the tributary obligation???