devil said:
Only greed for more drives you forward. It is no secret you are the worst ally one can get, you don't help when the shit hits the fan, nor do give any monetary aid.
True with the first sentence, but with one addition: I am generally not the one who starts wars. Like with Portugal or Holland. It was not a secret England desired the control of India, but this was not a secret for over 200 years
. Despite that, the relations of Portugal and England were good for both parties. Untill Portugal attacked us. Twice. The same is with Holland. They attacked with France. We retaliated, with somewhat harsh terms, offered better relations, they retalliated back and took Malacca and we accepted it as finally balanced situation and a base for better relations. But they attacked again...
About your second statement, let others be my judges. The only thing I will say is Mach III England basically used her allies very, very little. This was the campaign in which I relyed on the diplomacy the least so far. We will see how this will end. Quite possible with England vassal of France.
devil said:
Why would I do that, because I play, so others can enjoy the game. Right now I find it very unfortunate I have to maul forzaa, but that is my mission, that is what endgame is all about, hence I will do it.
That you said a number of times, but nothng happened except France hiding behind others or other goals
. It's a game. You are not maulimg ForzaA but trying to vassalise Austria. Or someone else. Opened kards indeed :rofl: .
devil said:
Spain and Porto joined me at their own free will, and whatever damage you give them I relay on austria/prussia. I told you this a thousand times, your greed is what kills the germans in the end. Don't kid yourself or any other...
Well, as I said, Mach III is where I am trying playing without too much plotting with others. Naturally, because I can. Mach II with Portugal, naturally, was quite different. There money was the main strangth I had.
But never was I mistaken for one who liked giving away something for nothing
. As for Germans, they got a clear message: English main enemy is France, not Sweden...
But really, do try elaborating a bit more on this concept of "relaying"... Did I got it right? Unlike greedy England driven only by her own ambitions and no-good ally, holly France is completely different: instead of protecting her vassal, she is achieving her own goals on the expense of that particular vassal :rofl: .
devil said:
If people are having fun with revolting then let them, who are you are you to decide, what they RP wise can do or can not do?
Once and for all understand I had nothing to do with others revolting, that I like it is one thing, that it help me is another, but I didn't help them revolt.
Now regarding endgame, there is not supposed to be balance in the end game, don't fucking cry just because I am a better diplomat than you and I manage to convince people to my cause.
Fair enough. I admit I choose a bit different way of playing in Mach III. I appologise for telling you how you should or should not play.
devil said:
Now you mauled, porto holland and usa without breaking a sweat. France and England are the same size evils. You are the terror of the seas, france is the terror on land. Whoever side people decide to join, its who they view as the lesser of 2 evils.
Oh, it was with MUCH sweat, and it is far form beeing over
. But again, I have to point out it is England and Canada who are attacked here.In fact, it is Canada who is attacked. How the fact that England is fighting in this war proves any of your remarks about England as ally or England as greedy aggressor?
And I would like to point out England lost 8 American colonies, Tierra del Fuego and Malacca in the 3 former aggressions of more or less the same group of countries: "USA", Holland and Portugal. The fourth war, in which "USA" was alone against Canada and England, ended without signifficant gains. This one is the first one in which forces of good
could end up victorious. Here is a lesson to learn: you can lose in wars. It's not a tragedy. Prepare better for the next time. Be patient, the enemy will make a mistake sooner or later. Like Holland and Portugal did. A SERIES of serious mistakes, that marked the outcome of this war. But still, even with those mistakes, it was with much os sweat for England.
Not to mention France and the new revolutionary regimes in Europe, who could easily join France and combined geater a fleet of over 800 warships
.
devil said:
Yes somehow you don't support french released USA, but canada hey that is allright... really get over yourself.
Your mission with canada was to give him enough cash to keep him from taking his land, as long you keep him happy, NA is safe as USA can't win. My design of canada was clearly for him to develop then fight to take control of all canada.
Well, "USA" is releassed by France, the main enemy of England and with a purposse to destroy England. While Canada was created in a rather peaceful partition of Denmark, who was almost constantly a freindly nation. As far as I saw it, this Friendly nation sold her Caribbean colonies to England and releassed Canada as a free nation. And England guaranteed the independence of that new nation, created by a friendly nation, ever since. Pretty consistant if you ask me. And with absolutely FREE HANDS for Canada to decide what to do in every moment.
You know perfectly well "USA" or English NA colonies are not worth fighting for. The easiest way out would be to sell it or get rid of them somehow. But that will not happen. England is not givng land. We need more :rofl: .
We hope to help Canada to take enough from "USA", because clearly, after this session, prolonging the lease of 6 English NA colonies is not possible any more.
devil said:
Really you are full of shit. You oppose France and USA, cause France is allmighty on the continent to keep balance. You hid behind france the first 100 years, then you changed sides in seconds, and began whining because I allied new formed holland a loyal and helpful ally. Very unlike you, that betrayed france over and over again. Had you played your cards right, you would be the one France had stayed with and holland would never be what they are today. So why did I ally porto, a nation waaay behind holland in everyway, one reason to boost rob and let him have some fun too. There was no tactical advantage in helping porto, like spain they where a very easy target.
90% of what you say is bullshit, very unlike you I am playing with open cards... And I don't play you get rich, I play to fulfill my mission. There is no doubt about,what I want and what I will do.
Well, there is one of the features that haven't changed in my style of playing EU2 and it's never ally the strongest power. That's why England reffused to help France with her plan to acquire Genoa, gaining thus a base in Mediterranean (Corsica). THAT is the reason you switched to Holland.
Portugal I don't know. Many things I don't know - you are definitelly not clear or trustworthy enough for me things to be clear
. As it should be, because we are the enemies.
