Why do they ally a lot?
Because they are afraid of big European warmongers?
Louis,
Because they are afraid of big European warmongers?
Louis,
Maybe because the poorer navals wont have to worry about having to spend 50% on their budget keeping up with the richest one in ships. Also, one war can have very bad consequences on trade, something which is very crucial to those small nations....Originally posted by LouisSteColombe
Why do they ally a lot?
Because they are afraid of big European warmongers?
Louis,
Originally posted by LouisSteColombe
Why do they ally a lot?
Because they are afraid of big European warmongers?
Louis,
Originally posted by BiB
It must be because like, say, I dunno, Poland and Russia for example, they don't see much cause to go at each other.
Originally posted by Lord_Robertus
I had to chuckle when I read that.
We will all one day be speaking French... except maybe the Great Russian bear.
Originally posted by Damocles
I mean...Machiavelli 2 has had almost ZERO fricken overseas colonial wars. The whole concept of 'limited war' first arose because of that. When was the last time anyone ever saw the Dutch go after Portugese Brazil, Africa or India in any game as they historically did?
Originally posted by Damocles
If History is any guide, England, Netherlands and Portugal should be fighting a host of limited, overseas colonial wars with each other. But instead, they're all allied up, which seems to happen alot. Unlike in RL, where the Netherlands gained most of its colonies off of Portugal. (Before losing them to England/France)
Originally posted by Damocles
Mulletboy is pretty much right. They pussyfoot around and avoid limited colonial wars, since they're too busy making money and leaping ahead technologically...When in fact, they should be enjoying naval wars to grab big swathes of overseas empires.
I mean...Machiavelli 2 has had almost ZERO fricken overseas colonial wars. The whole concept of 'limited war' first arose because of that. When was the last time anyone ever saw the Dutch go after Portugese Brazil, Africa or India in any game as they historically did?
EDIT: Hell. The limited war should be a huge boon to the Dutch. But they NEVER use it. EVER.
Originally posted by Damocles
If History is any guide, England, Netherlands and Portugal should be fighting a host of limited, overseas colonial wars with each other. But instead, they're all allied up, which seems to happen alot. Unlike in RL, where the Netherlands gained most of its colonies off of Portugal. (Before losing them to England/France)
Originally posted by Damocles
EDIT: Hell. The limited war should be a huge boon to the Dutch. But they NEVER use it. EVER.
Originally posted by Damocles
Well. Mach 2 is the first game where I have ever heard anyone bitching about Russian-Polish antagonism,
Originally posted by Smirfy
My lobby to make Portugal richer like it was...
Originally posted by ForzaA
explain to me, then, how an invasion is going to conquer a whole COUNTRY, Brasil is far too large to defeat with only naval-based armies, coming from home... the situation is almost the same as proposing Brandenburg should attack Poland alone.. Now, if this colonial war concept is going to represent how it really happened everyone should have ToT-like abilities, ie. capturing a province without being at war. But that isn't going to happen.
As i said before, all that matters in colonial warfare is regional superiority OR extremely superior navies.. and that isn't going to happen against portugal.
Originally posted by Damocles
IS PORTUGAL RICH ENOUGH YET?![]()
Originally posted by Damocles
IS PORTUGAL RICH ENOUGH YET?![]()
Originally posted by Damocles
A) Build a trade income
B) Build a navy
C) Use higher manpower to defeat Portugal overseas.
England can then do the same to the Dutch. Which is how it all worked historically.![]()
PJL should decide. Annex it to Denmark? Fight on for the hope of getting lands back?Originally posted by Barnius
4) What to do with Sweden generally?