In all fairness BiB, roleplaying a close, loving family between Spain and Austria is as believable as Jesus being born in Toledo. But I suppose, it is all the same thing when you get right down to it.
Originally posted by Damocles
I AGREE.
Austria agreed to let me take Dalmatia, Corfu, Cyprus and Crete off Venice without resisting. I was just giving him the maps as an offering of thanks and understanding between us. Too bad I forgot about his 'forget favors' everytime a new monarch shows up.
Originally posted by Damocles
In all fairness BiB, roleplaying a close, loving family between Spain and Austria is as believable as Jesus being born in Toledo. But I suppose, it is all the same thing when you get right down to it.
Originally posted by Damocles
I still don't think Spain's income was greater then France, Austria and OE combined. During Suleyman's rule, the Ottoman Empire was supposed to be the wealthiest nation in Europe. (Possible competition from China)
Originally posted by Damocles
If I want to give maps to allies, I should be able to. If you can bribe with islands, I should be able to with maps. Especially if it actually roleplayed out. You're just scared of me giving the maps to the protestants and you having your trade income dropping from 100ish to 80ish or something.
And the English King in 1419 got most of his income from one little province in France. Just one of many things the game can't simulate either in a certain fashion but gets quite right in the bigger picture.
Originally posted by Damocles
What cooperation? France and OE have been purely in their own interests. I made peace with Hungary regardless of France still being at war with Spain and Austria. Do you think I would have peaced out with the AI if I was cooperating with France?
I've already admitted that my joining the other war was a stupid mistake based on Suleyman's egotistical desire to play Aribiter of Europe.
Originally posted by Damocles
I've always thought that one of the ways to correct the evil of overpowered godlike Spain was having the other nations who don't get as many explorers...(If a nation explored the same area with 5 different people, only give them one fucking explorer please so the others don't end up in Bangkok instead of Havana) get access to those other cots as well.
Letting one or two nations have ahistorical access to a 100 ducats of trade income all to themselves for a 100 years is just sooooooooo wrong.
Originally posted by BiB
France, Portugal, England (and Holland in a certain way, they won't have to but could anyway) managed to explore just fine too. And those are the nations that should be there. Not Austria, Sweden or the Pope. Not anyone who flaps some 100 ducat bills once to someone with maps.
Originally posted by Damocles
Bibby,
I don't think that you only do things for self benefit. I think there is a vein of honest goodness in most of your decisions. Well, at least a majority of them. But they also benefit you as well.
For example. If you didn't release Holland, you'd deal with terrible revolt risks until 1640. By releasing Holland, you instantly end all of your revolt risks at the cost of a single province. Holland. Geldre and Friesland didn't belong to you, and you're getting Zeeland back. Furthermore, they're catholic and a vassal and William of Orange is forcibly killed. Somehow, I think that you still think you won't have any problem from the Dutch anyway because of your commanding position over them. Pretending to go the moral high road and deflecting ire from the Dutch lobby while instantly ending a 60 year pain in the ass must not be too much of a bitter pill to swallow.
Originally posted by Damocles
Actually, in one of my more rambling paragraphs, I did mention that one of the exceptions of the Habsburg cooperation was against France's expansionistic ambitions. But I don't blame you if you've skimmed most of them.