Those are actually quite interesting points. I guess unless Communist Europe wants to get bombed from Sub-Sahara and USSR from India once the US get jet-strat. bombers we have to fight to get control over these areas. Really interesting look at it, perhaps there should be a major offensive into Africa![]()
I've a,ways wondered when the penny dropped that literally every acre of land the enemy controlled was now a national security threat, and wat the guys face looked like when he figured it out. In this timeline, with such nukes being used all the time and with war pretty serious for both sides, nothing short of a large ocean is keeping you safe from nukes (and after missile tech advances, nothing but MAD). Kinda makes you reconsider how nerve racking all those incidents and treaties and stuff must have been for both sides to figure out and agree to. It would have been so easy to misstep and kill everyone.
Here, the situation is even worse. Not only does the SU need to take Africa but it also needs to raoidly expand the navy to match the Americans, because at this point should the Allies lose Africa they could always patrol air craft carrier fleets and launch bombers from there instead. So the complete conquest of the entire old world is just to buy time, a delaying tactic, to allow for communist forces to both developed nukes of their own and have anavy capable of deploying bombers to carry them, and to combat the enemy fleet trying to do the same.