I've just been playing a game that just had a massive three way war for the crown the HRE. As the wars ended, I experienced three different issues (I'm only reporting them together because the situations that lead to them are closely connected).
To summarize the situation and issues:
The Emperor, "A", gets attacked by a pretender "B" (and a bunch of allies) and another pretender "C" (and a few allies).
One of A's loyal dukes "D" declares a separate war against one of B's allies "E" (who's become temporarily independent thanks to the war).
B defeats A, becoming the new Emperor. He's still at war with C.
A few months later, D (who's now a vassal of B) has one of his own vassals "F" rebel.
C defeats B, becoming the new-new Emperor.
Issue #1 is that B's defeat of A ends the war between D and E, even though they're allowed to go to war again almost immediately since Crown Authority got reset when the pretender took over.
Issue #2 is that after B's initial victory, most of his allies choose to answer a call to arms from the other pretender C, even though that means they're now trying to overthrow B who they'd just put on the throne.
Issue #3 is that when C overthrows B, it ends D's war with his rebellious vassal F, with a result identical to if F had won the rebellion. This may be a variation on issue #1.
Here's the details:
The first issue is related to a the three way war for the HRE crown. I was a vassal of the original HRE (holding a bunch of duke titles) and was one of the few who remained loyal (neither of the pretenders called me to their side or I would have joined in). Rather than have my troops killed in the doomed war on my liege's side, I took the opportunity to declare my own war against a duke who was independent because of joining one of the pretenders in the main war. HRE crown law had been preventing vassals from declaring wars on each other, so my claim against him had been waiting a long time.
The issue came up when the Emperor lost the war to one of the pretenders. I had not yet completed conquering the one duke I had singled out, but my warscore was over 40% and I know I would have won if my war had continued. But instead it ended "inconclusively" when the new emperor took over (and my opponent ceased to be independent). However, due to the successful overthrow of the ruler, HRE Crown Authority got reset to low, so I was allowed to declare war on the duke I'd been beating on again immediately (or rather, immediately after dismissing all non-mercenary levies).
My opinion is that my war shouldn't have ended when it did. Only if the original Emperor had won the war (reestablishing High Crown Authority and so making vassal vs vassal wars forbidden) should the war have been aborted.
The second issue came up a short time later. Many of the allies of the pretender who won the war against the original emperor (and thus became his vassals when he took over) suddenly became independent again, as they'd been called to arms by the third side of the war, a second pretender to the throne.
This seems like broken AI coding to me, as an ally to a pretender shouldn't ever join a different pretender against their victorious friend (one or two leaders changing sides in the middle of the war would make for an interesting event, but it's broken when half the realm does it).
My third issue may actually be a variation on the first one. After winning my Ducal claim war on the second try, I was planning on sitting out the rest of the HRE's war. However, I foolishly attempted to arrest a plotting count of mine. He escaped and rebelled against me. I raised some troops (difficult to do, since more half my territory was still being occupied in the larger war) and started besieging his two counties. Before I could finish him off though, the second pretender won his war against new Emperor, and became the third Holy Roman Emperor in as many years. This unexpectedly ended my war again, though without any message about it being "inconclusive" this time. We were just suddenly at peace. The counties I was besieging were still held by the count who'd rebelled, but he was now a direct vassal to the (latest) Emperor.
This seems like it might be related to the first issue, but as there are a few differences in the details, it is not entirely clear (for instance, neither of the sides in the war in this issue was independent). I would expect that I'd be allowed to carry on fighting my own rebelling vassal regardless of who our higher liege was.
I have a couple of saves from various points in these events, but I'm not sure which one are which at the moment. If they're needed I can post a few of them tomorrow.
To summarize the situation and issues:
The Emperor, "A", gets attacked by a pretender "B" (and a bunch of allies) and another pretender "C" (and a few allies).
One of A's loyal dukes "D" declares a separate war against one of B's allies "E" (who's become temporarily independent thanks to the war).
B defeats A, becoming the new Emperor. He's still at war with C.
A few months later, D (who's now a vassal of B) has one of his own vassals "F" rebel.
C defeats B, becoming the new-new Emperor.
Issue #1 is that B's defeat of A ends the war between D and E, even though they're allowed to go to war again almost immediately since Crown Authority got reset when the pretender took over.
Issue #2 is that after B's initial victory, most of his allies choose to answer a call to arms from the other pretender C, even though that means they're now trying to overthrow B who they'd just put on the throne.
Issue #3 is that when C overthrows B, it ends D's war with his rebellious vassal F, with a result identical to if F had won the rebellion. This may be a variation on issue #1.
Here's the details:
The first issue is related to a the three way war for the HRE crown. I was a vassal of the original HRE (holding a bunch of duke titles) and was one of the few who remained loyal (neither of the pretenders called me to their side or I would have joined in). Rather than have my troops killed in the doomed war on my liege's side, I took the opportunity to declare my own war against a duke who was independent because of joining one of the pretenders in the main war. HRE crown law had been preventing vassals from declaring wars on each other, so my claim against him had been waiting a long time.
The issue came up when the Emperor lost the war to one of the pretenders. I had not yet completed conquering the one duke I had singled out, but my warscore was over 40% and I know I would have won if my war had continued. But instead it ended "inconclusively" when the new emperor took over (and my opponent ceased to be independent). However, due to the successful overthrow of the ruler, HRE Crown Authority got reset to low, so I was allowed to declare war on the duke I'd been beating on again immediately (or rather, immediately after dismissing all non-mercenary levies).
My opinion is that my war shouldn't have ended when it did. Only if the original Emperor had won the war (reestablishing High Crown Authority and so making vassal vs vassal wars forbidden) should the war have been aborted.
The second issue came up a short time later. Many of the allies of the pretender who won the war against the original emperor (and thus became his vassals when he took over) suddenly became independent again, as they'd been called to arms by the third side of the war, a second pretender to the throne.
This seems like broken AI coding to me, as an ally to a pretender shouldn't ever join a different pretender against their victorious friend (one or two leaders changing sides in the middle of the war would make for an interesting event, but it's broken when half the realm does it).
My third issue may actually be a variation on the first one. After winning my Ducal claim war on the second try, I was planning on sitting out the rest of the HRE's war. However, I foolishly attempted to arrest a plotting count of mine. He escaped and rebelled against me. I raised some troops (difficult to do, since more half my territory was still being occupied in the larger war) and started besieging his two counties. Before I could finish him off though, the second pretender won his war against new Emperor, and became the third Holy Roman Emperor in as many years. This unexpectedly ended my war again, though without any message about it being "inconclusive" this time. We were just suddenly at peace. The counties I was besieging were still held by the count who'd rebelled, but he was now a direct vassal to the (latest) Emperor.
This seems like it might be related to the first issue, but as there are a few differences in the details, it is not entirely clear (for instance, neither of the sides in the war in this issue was independent). I would expect that I'd be allowed to carry on fighting my own rebelling vassal regardless of who our higher liege was.
I have a couple of saves from various points in these events, but I'm not sure which one are which at the moment. If they're needed I can post a few of them tomorrow.
Upvote
0