Ahura Mazda: Do you mean like those last (topic focused) updates way much better than the elder, annual updates?
I was planning to go back to the one update per year style as soon as the whole revolution would be over, but maybe I have to replan.
demokratickid: Do you mean you don't like bicammeral systems, or do you mean that you don't understand them very well?
Garra-Ush: In fact the king has only few real powers, at least that was the way I planned it. The Prime Minister should be a fair match for him, and the parliament should be able to outrule them both.
The kings powers are very limited:
The king announces the Prime Minister after the Congress made the proposition who should be PM, normally this would be the leader of the majority faction in Congress. The king may deny to announce the proposed MP (Member of Parliament). There are no strict rules what will happen in such a case but it is to be expected that the Congress will make an alternative proposition and that the king will accept this choice. The point here is that the monarch couldn't announce PMs as he pleases, but that the main power lies in Congress at this point.
Same is true for the announcement of judges of the supreme court, the king will follow the propositions of the PM.
During the legislative process the king may deny the royal assent to a bill and thus veto it but the bill is send back to the Cortes for further discussion. The Cortes may alter it a bit to gain the royal assent or if 2/3 of all MPs (both from Senate and Congress) vote for it the bill is enacted against the monarchs will.
The last power the king holds due to the constitution is military supreme command. But this power is severely limited by the fact, that he is not able to declare war without the admission of the Congress on the one hand and that the Congress is in charge of taxation and budget and thus can prevent any military buildup, reform or intervention by not funding it.
asd21953: I guess it does on first sight. I'm sorry for that. As a student of politics it seemed all quite logical to me but I didn't think about how it looks for someone who isn't so used to constitutional schemes.
To all: I hope my explanation above gives you some insights in the platinean constitution and answers some of your questions. If you want something in peculiar to be explained just ask, it would be a pleassure to explain it.
The first one who guesses from which historical constitution I derived the platinean constitution gets a cookie, no not a cookie because I'm not authorized to give you some

but hmmm let me think ..... How about an appearance as a secretary, general, capitalist or something alike?