I was thinking more in terms of new features or overhauled features. The problem with AE was the constant knee jerk U turns on whether to have tons of AE or no AE, and whether vassal feeding was supposed to be the right way to expand or not.
Let's talk about positive things and how EU4 has improved since release...YAY！！！！！
- Thread starter toroltao
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I was thinking more in terms of new features or overhauled features. The problem with AE was the constant knee jerk U turns on whether to have tons of AE or no AE, and whether vassal feeding was supposed to be the right way to expand or not.
Hordes were really tedious to play well after a while and I always found myself becoming unduly bored long before the 1600s. Ongoing changes to hordes have minimized how often I make the terrible mistake of wanting to play one.
- New fort mechanics
- New building system
- Province development
... Oh, sorry. Were we talking about 1.11?
- New building system
- Province development
... Oh, sorry. Were we talking about 1.11?
- 12
- 1
Honestly, I think that Common Sense is probably going to be remembered as one of the most important expansions for EU4 - assuming that it works reasonably well within a couple weeks of release.
- 2
To my... significant surprise, I've actually found my Golden Horde game quite engaging (and intermittently enraging) all the way into the 1600s. (1625-1630ish now, and still unreformed. I might do something about that soon, I would like at least a small bite of the Admin Efficiency cherry.)
It has not changed very much from when I bought it on release, my friend even refused to patch the game so I think he still plays 1.0 version lol.
Unrest, army/navy templates and exploration missions on the qol side of things, improved reformation mechanics and all the extra flavour events for ROTW for making the game more immersive.
I haven't seen this posted here yet. No more micromanaging those annoying explorers who die when I forget about them after a war started.
- 5
Personally the aztecs and Inca in El Dorado which introduced very interesting mechanisms during peace time.
Can't wait for 1.12 and those forts...
Imagine, you siege and take one or two russian forts and all of a sudden, the whole of Russia is opened to you...
Can't wait for 1.12 and those forts...
Imagine, you siege and take one or two russian forts and all of a sudden, the whole of Russia is opened to you...
- 1
I've really liked the changes to subjects, including Liberty Desire for everyone and the Influence idea group.
- 1
I dunno, I don't think forts will have that much of an impact in SP as people think it will. It just basically establishes wave sieging as the proper (only) way to siege vs Carpet sieging.
AOW and Wealth of Nations, probably had the biggest impacts changes.
AOW being the best DLC Pdox has released so far (perhaps tied with old gods in ck2).
I would say the diversity in general. One can do multiple diverse things in every single game. You can do things like client states, trade companies etc etc. A better word would be choice or options, there are many but they aren't necessarily needed.
-AoW map overhaul.
-New rebel system.
-Rebalancing of unit types.
-Colonial Nations.
-New rebel system.
-Rebalancing of unit types.
-Colonial Nations.
