- Jul 5, 2009
You dont need to be a anti-semite to not like the idea of a zionist state you know. >_>
The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
Actually, rather ironically, Drexler supports the Zionist state because he is an anti-Semite. He wants to get rid of the Jews and send them to Israel, wehre presumably he thinks they won't bother the super-duper Aryan race or whatever rubbish.
I agree.You just did not start this...
...all the other parties suggest a bloodless revolution? Rapid growth or rapid abuse of locals and their resources?Marxist-Leninist!
Trotsky has freed millions now, and that will rise to billions as children are born in places free from autocratic tyranny. Millions died, yes, but no one said the revolution would not be paved with blood. Marxist economics have been proven to work, with the rapid economic recovery after the war and the rapid growth of industry in Africa being proof of that. The Marxist-Leninists are the only faction seeking to provide every man, woman and child with full, comprehensive healthcare. It is clear Trotsky is the best choice for the next term.
A vote for the National "Communists" is a vote for the True Germans professing quasi-socialist economics. And their policies drip with racism, and in particular anti-Semitism. Not only do they seek to deport all the Jews, a population grouping that is in the millions, to a region in another continent entirely, but to do so they would gladly invade and evict another group of people who have lived there for many centuries now.
And the Kadonists, too. They rant about the state, yet they seek to establish a constitution, a document which would physically represent the power of the state. They also threaten to revolt if Trotsky is elected. He would be elected democratically, need I add? So, while they cry for freedom and democracy, they also threaten to destroy it if it goes against them. They declare Trotsky a tyrant, yet are willing to impose their own tyranny if the people side with Trotsky. I smell the stench of hypocrisy.
A vote for Trotsky is a vote for progress, comrades! Vote for the Marxist-Leninists!
Bloodless revolution is not possible. The proletarian must overthrow the bourgeoisie or the monarchs at some point, and much blood will be shed. To think revolution is possible through democracy is naive at best, especially in places such as Japan and China, where views even slightly different from the state's are crushed under heel, never mind ideas which are entirely opposite....all the other parties suggest a bloodless revolution? Rapid growth or rapid abuse of locals and their resources?
DO NOT BLAME OTHER PARTIES FOR ANTI-SEMITISM.
Constitution? You know that the IDEA OF THE CONSTITUTION IS TO DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION, protecting individuals from the state.
Revolt? The only successful revolt we have had was that launched by Marxists.
What is progress without freedom and safety?
What is a fire without warmth?