• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well what am I then?
I hate all those damned commies and want to bring them down. In name of anarchy!
Destroy the state, destroy the party, kill Lenin and his slaves!
Doom everyone to freedom and competition!

Definitive proof that cannibalism leads to madness!
 
Well what am I then?
I hate all those damned commies and want to bring them down. In name of anarchy!
Destroy the state, destroy the party, kill Lenin and his slaves!
Doom everyone to freedom and competition!

Your a stonewall Anarcho-Capitalist Enewald.
 
Polls are now closed.

No further votes shall be counted.
 
I have a sad feeling the Democrats are going to be horribly well-represented. We're doomed!
 
The Final Results

Party Vote

Total Votes - 71 - very, very impressive. :D

Votes:

Marxist-Leninists: 18
Luxemburgists: 27
Democrats: 19
Moderates: 2
Militarists: 5

Percentage of Vote:

Marxist-Leninists: 25.35
Luxemburgists: 38.03
Democrats: 26.76
Moderates: 2.82
Militarists: 7.04

Seats:

Marxist-Leninists: 13
Luxemburgists: 19
Democrats: 13
Moderates: 1
Militarists: 4

Workers' Vote

Percentages:

Marxist-Leninists: 30.905%
Luxemburgists: 30.33%
Democrats: 15.015%
Moderates: 9.75%
Militarists: 14%

Seats:

Marxist-Leninists: 15
Luxemburgists: 15
Democrats: 8
Moderates: 5
Militarists: 7

Final Results - as ever the only thing that really matters

Constituent Assembly Seats (in order of size of faction):

Luxemburgists: 34

Marxist-Leninists: 28

Democrats: 21

Militarists: 11

Moderates: 6


The Luxemburgists form a coalition with the Democrats in order to create a government. Rosa Luxemburg is the first female Chairman. The reigning coalition holds 55 of 100 seats in the Assembly.

If you supported Rosa or Bernstein then be happy! Your factions have won. If you supported Lenin, Schlieffen or (I'll try to keep a straight face here) Kautsky then don't despair. The Marxists may well rally in the future.
 
Well what am I then?
I hate all those damned commies and want to bring them down. In name of anarchy!
Destroy the state, destroy the party, kill Lenin and his slaves!
Doom everyone to freedom and competition!

Precisely my point. Social Anarchists essentially are Communists. There are very slight differences between the two thoughts. Both want precisely the same thing, the only difference is in the details and how they believe it is possible to achieve them. You don't understand even the most basic tenants that the Anarchists of this great Republic stand for. You dribble bourgeois Anarcho-Capitalist nonsense and expect it to find fertile ground here. All you manage to achieve is to add fuel to the fire of Anarchy's critics, since they can point to the disgrace that you shed upon the movement.

If you supported Rosa or Bernstein then be happy! Your factions have won. If you supported Lenin, Schlieffen or (I'll try to keep a straight face here) Kautsky then don't despair. The Marxists may well rally in the future.

Although I'm a little dissapointed that the Luxemburgists didn't get enough of the vote to form government all on their own (as unlikely as it may have been), this is still a good result. Perhaps we will get the farmers to have a vote, finally. Viva Luxemburg!
 
Although I'm a little dissapointed that the Luxemburgists didn't get enough of the vote to form government all on their own (as unlikely as it may have been), this is still a good result. Perhaps we will get the farmers to have a vote, finally. Viva Luxemburg!

I'd say the Luxemburgists will compromise on Religion and Suffrage while the Democrats will compromise on the Soviets and (non-suffrage related) political reform.
 
I'd say the Luxemburgists will compromise on Religion and Suffrage while the Democrats will compromise on the Soviets and (non-suffrage related) political reform.

Wow. That was almost exactly correct. The Dems will get a compromised religious policy, farmer suffrage and an isolationist foriegn policy and the Luxemburgists most of everything else.
 
Isolationist? Bah, we should be smashing the capitalists, not playing nice with them!
 
Wow. That was almost exactly correct. The Dems will get a compromised religious policy, farmer suffrage and an isolationist foriegn policy and the Luxemburgists most of everything else.

When you say isolationist, do you mean pacifist (VSVR will start no wars but will look to support socialist and revolutionary movements overseas through funding) or isolationist (VSVR will start no wars nor offer support to socialist and revolutionary movements overseas)?
 
Precisely my point. Social Anarchists essentially are Communists. There are very slight differences between the two thoughts. Both want precisely the same thing, the only difference is in the details and how they believe it is possible to achieve them. You don't understand even the most basic tenants that the Anarchists of this great Republic stand for. You dribble bourgeois Anarcho-Capitalist nonsense and expect it to find fertile ground here. All you manage to achieve is to add fuel to the fire of Anarchy's critics, since they can point to the disgrace that you shed upon the movement.

Socialism and anarchy cannot be combined, therefore I do not support anarcho-socialism.
I hate Kropotkin. And Lenin. And soon Luxemburg too.
But that is how I am.

The lone anarchist. Free to rage against everyone.
 
When you say isolationist, do you mean pacifist (VSVR will start no wars but will look to support socialist and revolutionary movements overseas through funding) or isolationist (VSVR will start no wars nor offer support to socialist and revolutionary movements overseas)?

I mean we will not start any wars and help to overseas revolutionaries will be reduced but ofc not stopped.

ps Enewald, your not really an Anarachist. Your clearly just an anarchic capitalist. That is not Anarchism.
 
I mean we will not start any wars and help to overseas revolutionaries will be reduced but ofc not stopped.

ps Enewald, your not really an Anarachist. Your clearly just an anarchic capitalist. That is not Anarchism.

Acctually fine by me, I'm more worried about how bourgeois our Republic still is, we need to secure the revolution at home. Ban religion, build a new capital with no Bourgeois past, Proletarize the peasants and petty bourgeois by collectivizing agriculture and drag the artisans to the factories, abolish the bourgeois languages and adopt a new international Socialist language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.